The Surgeon’s Photo

The modern history of the Loch Ness Monster began in 1933 when a new road was completed along the northern shore of Loch Nessproviding easy access to unobstructed views of the water. Soon after thisa couple spotted an "enormous animal" in the Loch. The Inverness Courier wrote up their sightingdescribing what they saw as a "monster." Intense media interest followedand thus was born the modern legend of the Loch Ness Monster.

Later that same yearthe Daily Mailtaking advantage of the Nessie crazehired a famous big-game hunterMarmaduke Wetherellto travel up to the Loch to investigate the sightings and to find the monsterif he could. Although he found no monsterin December 1933 he did locate what appeared to be its tracks—enormous footprints on the shore of the Loch leading into the water. Unfortunatelywhen researchers from the Natural History Museum examined the tracksthey determined they had been made with a dried hippo's footof the kind that were popularly used as umbrella stands. HumiliatedWetherell retreated from public view.

But a few months laterthe Loch Ness monster again made headlines when a highly respected British surgeonColonel Robert Wilsoncame forward with a picture (top) that appeared to show a sea serpent rising out of the water of the Loch.

Wilson claimed he took the photograph early in the morning on April 191934while driving along the northern shore of Loch Ness. He said he noticed something moving in the water and stopped his car to take a photo. For decades this photo was considered to be the best evidence of the existence of a sea monster in the Loch. But Wilson himself refused to have his name associated with it. Therefore it came to be known simply as "The Surgeon's Photo."

For years skeptics were sure that the photo was somehow a hoax. But no rigorous studies of the image were conducted until 1984 when Stewart Campbell analyzed the photo in a 1984 article in the British Journal of Photography. Campbell concluded that the object in the water could only have been two or three feet longat mostand that it probably was an otter or a marine bird. He suggested it was likely that Wilson knew this to be the case.

But as it turned outCampbell was wrong. The object in the water was not a form of marine life. It was a toy submarine outfitted with a sea-serpent head. This was revealed in 1994 when Christian Spurlingbefore his death at the age of 90confessed to his involvement in a plot to create the famous Surgeon's Photoa plot that involved both Marmaduke Wetherell and Colonel Wilson.

According to Spurlinghe had been approached by Wetherell (his stepfather) who wanted him to make a convincing serpent model. Spurling did thisand this model was then photographed in Loch Ness. The picture was then given to Wilsonwhose job it was to serve as a credible front-man for the hoax.

Apparently Wetherell's motive was revengesince he was still smarting from his humiliation over the hippo-foot tracks. "We'll give them their monster," his son later remembered him saying.

In the original version of the image (bottom) the diminutive size of the Nessie model in relationship to the Loch can be seen. (The dark band along the top of the picture is the opposite side of the Loch.) The image given to the media was cropped to hide this perspectivemaking the "monster" appear larger than it actually was.