×

注意!页面内容来自https://www.cdc.gov/covid/hcp/clinical-care/overview-testing-sars-cov-2.html,本站不储存任何内容,为了更好的阅读体验进行在线解析,若有广告出现,请及时反馈。若您觉得侵犯了您的利益,请通知我们进行删除,然后访问 原网页

What to know

This overview describes current information on the types of tests used to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection and their intended uses. This information is intended for use by healthcare providerspublic health professionalsand those organizing and implementing testing in non-healthcare settings.

Test types

Resource

Information for the general public on COVID-19 testing is also available.

Viral testsincluding nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and PCR testsas well as antigen testsare used as diagnostic tests to detect current infection with SARS-CoV-2determine the need for prevention measuresand inform a person's medical care.

Viral tests

  • Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are highly sensitive and highly specific tests that detect one or more viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) genes. PCR tests are the most common type of NAAT used for COVID-19 testing. Viral RNA may stay in a person's body for up to 90 days after they test positive. ThereforeNAATs should not be used to test someone who has tested positive in the last 90 days. Most NAATs need to be performed in a laboratoryalthough some are performed at the point-of-care. Most NAATs produce qualitative (positive/negative) results.
  • Antigen tests are immunoassays that detect the presence of specific viral proteinscalled antigens. A positive test indicates current infection. Antigen tests generally have high specificitysimilar to NAATsbut are less sensitive than most NAATs. Because antigen tests have lower sensitivityFDA recommends that negative antigen tests be repeated up to three timeswith each test 48 hours apart to confirm a negative result. Most antigen tests are less expensive than NAATs and can provide results in minutes. Antigen tests are available for at-home testing (self-testing)at the point of careor in a laboratory.
    • As noted in the labeling for authorized over-the-counter antigen tests: Negative results should be treated as presumptive (meaning that they are preliminary results). Negative results do not rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisionsincluding infection control decisions. Please see FDA guidance on the use of at-home COVID-19 antigen tests.
  • Other diagnostic tests may be used to detect SARS-CoV-2 from non-traditional respiratory specimenssuch as breath. These tests' results may be presumptive and require confirmation by NAAT. Please refer to each test's Instructions for Use (IFU) for specific interpretation.

Positive viral test results indicate current infection and the person with COVID-19 should take steps to prevent spreading COVID-19 to others.

Negative viral test results mean the test did not detect the virusbut this doesn't rule out that the person could have an infection. These results represent a snapshot of the time around specimen collection and could change if the same test was performed again in one or more days. Negative antigen test results should be repeated following FDA guidance.

Antibody (or serology) tests are used to test for the presence of antibodies from previous infection or vaccination and can aid in fulfilling the case definition for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and adults (MIS-A).1 Antibody testing does not diagnose current infection. Antibody testing is primarily used for public health surveillance and epidemiologic purposes. Antibody tests detect specific antibodies that target different parts (nucleocapsid or spike protein) of the virus. Detection of anti-nucleocapsid antibody indicates SARS-CoV-2 infectionwhile anti-spike protein antibody may be induced by COVID-19 vaccination or by SARS-CoV-2 infection. This should be considered when choosing whether to test for antibodies originating from past infection versus those from vaccination.

COVID-19 Test Monitoring

FDA continually monitors the accuracy of COVID-19 tests. Their website provides up-to-date information on the impact of viral mutations on COVID-19 tests. See FDA's list of In Vitro Diagnostics Emergency Use Authorizations for more information about the performance and interpretation of specific authorized tests.

Diagnostic testing

Testing individuals with signs or symptoms consistent with COVID-19

Positive test results using a viral test (NAATantigen or other tests) in individuals with signs or symptoms consistent with COVID-19 indicate that the person has COVID-19. A negative antigen test in individuals with signs or symptoms of COVID-19 should be repeated following FDA recommendations or confirmed by NAAT.

Additionallyconsider other illnesses with similar symptoms that may require testing. For many diseasesincluding fluearly diagnosis and prompt treatment can be important for preventing severe illness.

Anyone who tests positive should take steps to prevent spreading COVID-19 to others orif in a healthcare settingbe placed on appropriate precautions. Some people should receive treatment. Most people with COVID-19 have mild illness and can recover at home.

Vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 testing

Vaccination does not affect the results of someone's SARS-CoV-2 NAATantigenor other diagnostic tests.

The main effect of vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 testing is related to antibody testing. Because mRNA COVID-19 vaccines use the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to generate an immune responsea positive serologic (antibody) test for spike protein IgM/IgG could indicate either previous infection or vaccination.

Antibody testing is not currently recommended to assess a person's protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 following COVID-19 vaccination or prior infectionor to assess the need for vaccination in an unvaccinated person. Antibody testing can be used in the diagnosis of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) or Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults (MIS-A).

To evaluate for evidence of previous infection in a vaccinated individualuse an antibody test specifically evaluating IgM/IgG to the nucleocapsid protein. For examplespecific antibody tests can be used for public health surveillance.

Table 1. NAAT and Antigen Test* Differences

NAATs Antigen Tests*
Intended Use Diagnose current infection Diagnose current infection
Analyte Detected Viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) Viral antigens
Specimen Type(s) Nasalnasopharyngealoropharyngealsputumsaliva Nasalnasopharyngeal
Sensitivity Varies by testbut generally high for laboratory-based tests and moderate-to-high for point-of-care (POC) tests Less sensitive than NAATs. Varies by test and depending on the course of infection+*
Specificity High High
Test Complexity Varies by test Relatively easy to use
Authorized for Use at the Point of Care Most are notsome are Most aresome are not
Turnaround Time Most 1–3 days; some are rapid with results in 15 minutes Ranges from 15 minutes to 30 minutes
Cost/Test ~$75-$100/test ~$5-$50/test
Advantages
  • Most sensitive test method available
  • Short turnaround time for NAAT POC testsbut few available
  • Usually does not need to be repeated to confirm results
  • Short turnaround time (approximately 15 minutes) ◊
  • Cost-effective
  • Some can be performed at homeor anywhere else
Disadvantages
  • Longer turnaround time for lab-based tests (1–3 days)
  • Higher cost per test
  • After an infection has endedand the risk of transmission has passedpeople may have detectable RNA and test positive for up to 90 days
  • Negative tests should be confirmed by NAAT or repeated as recommended by FDA
  • Less sensitive (more false negative results) compared to NAATsespecially among asymptomatic people and with some variants

Notice

* As noted in the labeling for authorized over-the-counter antigen tests: negative results should be treated as presumptive (meaning that they are preliminary results). Negative results do not rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisionsincluding infection control decisions. Please see FDA guidance on the use of at-home COVID-19 antigen tests.

† The decreased sensitivity of antigen tests might be offset if the POC antigen tests are repeated more frequently.

◊ Refers to point-of-care antigen tests only.

Health Equity in SARS-CoV-2 testing

  • Social determinants of health may influence access to testing. For exampletravel time may limit access toand use oftesting services for those who have limited access to transportation and who live in areas with fewer public transit services and schedules. Racial and ethnic disparities in test site distribution have been found2. Other factors that may affect both access toand use oftesting services include:
  • Lack of health insurance
  • Concern about the costs or co-pays
  • Occupational factors such as not being able to take time off work and lack of paid leave
  • Lack of accessible options for people with disabilitiesand
  • Distrust of the government and healthcare systems3,4,5,6

Delays in testing may also delay seeking care and treatment (when sick) as well as delays in prevention measures that could reduce the spread of the virus to others.

One component to move toward greater health equity is ensuring availability of resourcesincluding access to testing for populations who have experienced longstandingsystemic health and social inequities. All population groupsincluding racial and ethnic minority groupsshould have equal access to affordablequalityand timely SARS-CoV-2 testing—with fast turnaround time for results. Efforts should be made to address barriers that might overtly or inadvertently create inequalities in testing.

In additioncompleteness of race and ethnicity data is an important factor in understanding the impact the virus has on racial and ethnic minority populations. When possiblehealthcare providers and public health professionals should ask and record race and ethnicity for anyone receiving a reportable test result and ensure these data are reported with the person’s test results to facilitate understanding the impact of COVID-19 on racial and ethnic minority populations.

Some strategies to achieve health equity in testing access and availability include:

  • Use a social vulnerability index to assist in selecting testing sites.
  • Increase the availability of free testing sites in communities. Employerscommunity-basedand faith-based organizations can be important partners to increase the number of freecommunity-based testing sites. This expansion ensures that wait times both for testing and reporting of results are decreased.
  • Increase accessible and culturally appropriate public messaging about the importance of testing and communicate these messages in multiple accessible formatslanguagesand venuesparticularly in communities at higher risk and disproportionately impacted by the virus.

References

  1. Morris SBSchwartz NGPatel Pet al. Case Series of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection – United Kingdom and United StatesMarch-August 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(40):1450-1456. Published 2020 Oct 9. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6940e1
  2. Dalva-Baird NPAlobuia WMBendavid EBhattacharya J. Racial and ethnic inequities in the early distribution of U.S. COVID-19 testing sites and mortality. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021;51(11):e13669. doi:10.1111/eci.13669
  3. Economic Policy Institute. Black Workers Face Two of the Most Lethal Preexisting Conditions for Coronavirus—Racism and Economic Inequality [online]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 28].
  4. BerchickEdward R.Jessica C. Barnettand Rachel D. Upton Current Population ReportsP60-267(RV)Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2018Government Printing OfficeWashingtonDC2019.
  5. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance. Care Without Coverage: Too LittleToo Late. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2002.
  6. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health CareSmedley BDStith AYNelson AReds. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2003.