Intermetallics are compounds formed from two metalscharacterized by a distinct crystal structure and properties that differ from those of their parent metals. They typically exhibit long range orderingwhich can lead to increased strength but reduced ductility and fracture toughness.
Intermetallics are compounds synthesized either from two metal elements or from one metal and one metalloid with integer ratios (chemometry). Intermetallics have many metallic characteristicssuch as lusterand electrical and thermal conductivity. Intermetallics maintain structural stability even when combined with other chemicalsand appear as ordered solid solutions in phase diagrams.
The chemical formulas of intermetallics formed with the constituent elements A and B will usually be ABA2B and A3B. There are also some special structuressuch as A5B3 or A7B6. The existing A5B3 or A7B6 intermetallics include Mo5Si3Ti5Si3Nb6Fe7 and W6Co7among others.1 Intermetallics can also be formed from three or more constituent elementsso the intermetallic family is very large.
Ordered intermetallic structural materials have recently been the focus of many investigations. Remarkable progress has been made using A3B and AB intermetallics from the Ti–AlNi–Al and Fe–Al systems. Some physical properties of several important intermetallics are listed in Table 8.1.
Table 8.1. Physical properties of several important intermetallics
The term “intermetallics” has been used to designate the intermetallic phases and compounds that result from the combination of various metalsand which form a large class of materials. There are mainly three types of superlattice structures based on the f.c.c. latticei.e.L12 with a variant of L′12 (in which a small interstitial atom of C or N is inserted at the cube center)L10and L12-derivative long-period structures such as DO22 or DO23. The b.c.c.-type structures are B2 and DO3 or L21. The DO19 structure is one of the most typical superlattices based on h.c.p. symmetry.
The term “intermetallics” has been used to designate the intermetallic phases and compounds that result from the combination of various metalsand which form a large class of materials [592]. There are mainly three types of superlattice structures based on the f.c.c. latticei.e.L12 with a variant of L′12 (in which a small interstitial atom of C or N is inserted at the cube center)L10and L12-derivative long-period structures such as DO22 or DO23. The b.c.c.-type structures are B2 and DO3 or L21. The DO19 structure is one of the most typical superlattices based on h.c.p. symmetry. Table 6 lists the crystal structurelattice parameterand density of selected intermetallic compounds [593]. A comprehensive review on the physical metallurgy and processing of intermetallics can be found in Ref. [594].
Table 6. Crystal structurelattice parametersand density of selected intermetallic compounds
Alloy
Structure (Bravais lattice)
Lattice parameters
Density (g cm−3)
a (nm)
c (nm)
Ni3Al
L12 (simple cubic)
0.357
–
7.40
NiAl
B2 (simple cubic)
0.288
–
5.96
Ni2AlTi
DO3
0.585
–
6.38
Ti3Al
DO19
0.577
0.464
4.23
TiAl
L10
0.398
0.405
3.89
Al3Ti
DO22
0.395
0.860
3.36
FeAl
B2 (simple cubic)
5.4–6.7 [599]
Fe3Al
DO3
5.4–6.7 [599]
MoSi2
C11b
6.3
Intermetallics often have high melting temperatures (usually higher than 1000 °C)due partly to the strong bonding between unlike atomswhich isin generala mixture between metallicionicand covalent to different extents. The presence of these strong bonds is also associated with high creep resistance. Another factor that contributes to the superior strength of intermetallics at elevated temperature is the high degree of long-range order [596]which results in low diffusivity; the number of atoms per unit cell is large in a material with long-range order. Thereforein alloys in which dislocation climb is rate-controllinga decrease in the diffusion rate would result in a drop in the creep rate and therefore an increase of the creep resistance.
One major disadvantage of these materialswhich is limiting their industrial applicationis low fracture toughness [597]. This is attributed to several factors. Firstthe strong atomic bonds as well as the long-range order give rise to high Peierls stresses. Secondgrain boundaries are intrinsically weak. The low boundary cohesion results in part from the directionality of the distribution of the electronic charge in ordered alloys [594]. The strong atomic bonding between the two main alloy constituents is related to the p-d orbital hibridizationwhich leads to a strong directionality in the charge distribution. The directionality is reduced in grain boundaries and the bonding becomes much weaker. Other factors that may contribute to the brittleness in intermetallics are the limited number of operative slip systemssegregation of impurities at grain boundariesa high-work hardening rateplanar slipand the presence of constitutional defects. The latter may befor exampleatoms occupying sites of a sublattice other than their own sublattice (antisites) or vacancies of deficient atomic species (constitutional vacancies). The planar faultsdislocation dissociationsand dislocation core structures typical of intermetallics were summarized by Yamaguchi and Umakoshi [598]. Other so-called extrinsic factors that cause brittleness are the presence of segregantsinterstitialsmoisture in the environmentpoor surface finishand hydrogen [599]. It appears that those intermetallics with more potential as high-temperature structural materialsi.e.those that are less brittleare compounds with high crystal symmetry and small unit cells. Thusnickel aluminidestitanium aluminidesand iron aluminides have been most studied over the last few decades. These investigations were stimulated by both the possibility of industrial application and scientific interest [592–601][592][593][594][595][596][597][598][599][600][601].
Creep resistance is a critical property in materials used for high-temperature structural applications. Some intermetallics may have the potential to replace nickel superalloys in parts such as the rotating blades of gas turbines or jet engines [602] due to their higher melting temperatureshigh oxidation and corrosion resistancehigh creep resistanceand in some cases lower density. The creep behavior of intermetallics is more complicated than that of pure metals and disordered solid solution alloys due to their complex structures together with the varieties of chemical composition [23,603][23][603]. The rate-controlling mechanisms are still not fully understood despite significant efforts over the last couple of decades [592,598,604–612][592][598][604][605][606][607][608][609][610][611][612].
In the followingthe current understanding of creep of intermetallics will be reviewedplacing special emphasis on investigations published over the last two decades and related to the compounds with potential for structural applications such as titanium aluminidesiron aluminidesand nickel aluminides.
9.6.1 General properties of intermetallic compounds
In terms of their propertiesintermetallic compounds are generally regarded as a class of materials between metals and ceramics which arises from the bonding being a mixture of metallic and covalent. Intermetallics are intrinsically strong (and in the Ll2-ordered fcc compounds increases with temperature up to about 600°C) with high elastic modulus. The strong bonding and ordered structure also gives rise to lower self-diffusion coefficients and hence greater stability of diffusion-controlled properties. Some of the compounds of current interest are shown in Table 9.4. Intermetallics containing aluminium or silicon exhibit a resistance to oxidation and corrosion because of their adherent surface oxides. Those based on light elements have attractive low density giving rise to high specific properties particularly important in weight-saving applications.
Table 9.4. Comparison of physical properties of some intermetallic compounds
Compound
Crystal structure
Melting temp. (°C)
Density (kg m−3)
Young's modulus/density
Ni3Al
Ll2 (ordered fcc)
1400
7500
45
Ni3Si
Ll2 (ordered fcc)
1140
7300
NiAl
B2 (ordered bcc
1640
5860
35
Ti3Si
D019 (ordered cph)
1600
4200
50
TiAl
Ll0 (ordered tetragonal)
1460
3910
24
FeAl
B2 (ordered bcc)
1300
5560
47
Like ceramicshoweverthe greatest disadvantage of intermetallics is their low ductilityparticularly at low and intermediate temperatures. The reasons for the lack of ductility vary from compound to compound but include (1) a limited number of easy deformation modes to satisfy the von Mises criterion(2) operation of dislocations with large slip vectors(3) restricted cross-slip(4) difficulty of transmitting slip across grain boundaries(5) intrinsic grain boundary weakness(6) segregation of deleterious solutes to grain boundaries(7) covalent bonding and high Peierls-Nabarro stress and (8) environmental susceptibility. It has been demonstratedhoweverthat some intermetallics can be ductilized by small alloying additions: Ni3Al with boronTiAl with MnTi3Al with Nb. This observation has encouraged recent research and development of intermetallics and the possibility of application of those materials.
3.1 Intermetallics in HER and OER electrocatalysis
Intermetallics are the true solid solutions of two or more metals in their native oxidation states and are essentially alloys [65,93]. These intermetallics have recently become an area of attraction among researchers focusing on the development of highly active electrocatalysts. These intermetallics are not the actual catalysts but the pre-catalysts which upon exposure to highly alkaline and acidic solutions lose the unstable or the leachable component into the solution leaving only the active metal behind. The leftover active metal is concurrently conditioned electrochemically to form the oxide/hydroxide interface that it needs to become an active catalyst [94]. This electrochemical conditioning is universal with all types of electrocatalysts but what makes the intermetallics to have an edge over others is the newly created porous and roughened surface with a large surface area while preserving the atomic level bonding between the atoms of the active component. While the conventional catalysts get benefitted from this electrochemical conditioning only on the surfacethe intermetallics harvest the benefit of electrochemical conditioning throughout their structure. This also creates new paths for the electrolyte to access more active sites. All these favoring phenomena we witness with the intermetallics lead to an exceptional enhancement of electrocatalytic activity. These intermetallics are often reported as precatalysts of OER than of HER. To design an intermetallic pre-catalystthe conditions of synthesis can easily be found from the classical phase diagrams which help us find the appropriate composition of the metals to be alloyedpressureand temperature. An extensive literature review revealed a general relationship that these intermetallics have their leachable component mainly from the p block of the periodic table and the most common ones to stumble upon are SiSnGeGaand Al. All these metals are known for their quick dissolution in highly alkaline and acidic solutions and as a resultthe electrochemical dealloying and activation under these conditions become so very easy for these intermetallics. Some of the important studies and their highlights are as follows.
3.1.1 Intermetallics dealloyed in alkaline medium
A common observation is that all catalysts which will feature one or more active sites from the iron group 3d metals are always and almost dealloyed in alkaline solutions as they form highly active layered metal oxyhydroxide under OER conditions and Volmer step promoting metal hydroxides under HER conditions in alkaline solutions. An example is Hausmann and co-workers[95] reported an interesting finding that Fe6Ge5intermetallics continue to leach Ge out under OER conditions creating more space for the active FeOOH. Howeverthis phenomenon was found to be surface centered and the Ge well inside the Fe6Ge5 particles was fairly retained after 1 h of CA at an overpotential at which it delivered 10 mA cm−2. This resulted in an interesting Fe6Ge5 metallic core with FeOOH active surface. It is known that FeOOH when present alone is only moderately active because of its poor electronic conductivity.
Howevertheir core-shell structure featuring the metallic Fe6Ge5 helped them overcome this issue. Nonethelessa closer examination of the 25 h CA response reveals that the activity degrades with respect to time and achieves a stable performance after 20 h. This implies that the initial boost given by the creation of new active sites because of the leaching of Ge is later brought down by the structural reconstruction-induced agglomeration. This could potentially be an issue of concern for intermetallics. The same group also reported the FeSn intermetallic alloy[97] that was found to show similar activity enhancement because of the leaching of Sn. With thisthey also extended the scope of the catalyst beyond OER to hexamethyl furfural (HMF)ethanoland acetaldehyde oxidation (Fig. 4). Extending their interest to another active metal Ni and the leachable component Sithey made Ni2Si and applied the same for OER and dehydrogenation of primary amines very recently [98]. In another workthe same group showed that these intermetallics when activated can also be used for alkaline HER alongside OER with their CoSn2 intermetallic precatalyst [99]. Menezess and co-workers[100] prepared a nickel germanide intermetallic precatalyst that was able to form highly active NiOOH in situ while letting the Ge component be leached under OER conditions. Their post-OER characterizations revealed extensive oxidation of Ge (Fig. 5a-f). All recent similar studies were reviewed and benchmarked against their activity in Table 1.
Fig. 4. : Illustration depicting the formation of FeSn2 intermetallics by the Kirkendall process and the in-situ activation of the same during OER and its extended scope in multi-organic compounds oxidation in alkaline waters.
Reproduced with permission from ref. 96 (Copyright 2020Wiley).
Fig. 5. : (a) OER CVs of NiGe intermetallics with controls in 1.0 M KOH. (b) CA response for over 20 h. (c-d) post-CA TEM images showing surface reconstruction and NiOOH formation. (e-f) post-CA XPS analysis showing a little change in the oxidation state of Ni and complete oxidation of Ge.
Reproduced with permission from ref. 100 (Copyright 2020Wiley).
Table 1. Benchmarking intermetallic precatalysts containing a dealloyable component based on their activity [101–105].
Note: ‘N/A′ implies ‘Not Available’. There could be some minor inconsistencies with the activity numbers as some of them have been manually calculated from the given polarization curves. Rows featuring catalysts screened in different pH are colored to distinguish them easily.
3.1.2 Intermetallics dealloyed in acidic medium
In generalintermetallics that are dealloyed in acid a have main catalytically active component which is usually either Ir or Ru because these are the two well-known OER active stable electrocatalysts in acidic solutions. An example of this kind is the electrochemical dealloying of Ga from IrGa intermetallic alloy reported by Chen and co-workers [64]. In acid solutionsthe dealloying of Ga from IrGa resulted in the formation of IrOx surface layer that delivered a very lower OER overpotential and outperformed the commercial Ir/C by delivering threefold higher activity. Similarlyintermetallics of Pt can also be dealloyed from an acid-unstable component to deliver better HER performance. This was shown by Lim and co-workers who made popcorn-like GaPt3 intermetallic alloy which was dealloyed for Ga in acid and the Pt left behind with increased surface area outperformed the commercial Pt/C. Howeverthe existence of a non-precious OER catalysts cannot be excluded based on this fact. There are few Co and Fe-based electrocatalysts which undergo electrochemical dealloying in acidic solutions that form relatively stable spinel Co3O4 and Fe3O4 OER electrocatalysts. An example for this type of study is the work of Shen and co-workers[66] who showed that Fe5Si3 can be activated in acidic solutions and applied for OER in the same. Though it is contradicting to see a Fe-based OER catalyst shown to be stable in acid solutionsthe authors have backed their observation with the corrosion resistance provided by the amorphous SiO2 shell protecting the actual OER catalyst (i.e.FeOOH/Fe3O4). The results from these studies are encouraging in the context of bringing out exceptional activity enhancement.
These catalysts are also benchmarked in Table 1 along with the ones that were studied in alkaline solutions. Howeverthese intermetallics still have some issues like poor retention of initial activitymoderate enduranceand the possibility of agglomeration and reduced ECSA upon prolonged use. These are discussed in detail in the subsequent sections. This study revealed that the leachable components do not have to get wasted in the solution but they can also provide other benefits.
Intermetallics have many metallic characteristicsincluding lusterand electrical and thermal conductivity. Ordered intermetallic structural materials have recently been the focus of many investigations. The physical and brazing properties of Ni–Al system intermetallicsFe–Al intermetallics and Ti–Al intermetallics are presented in this chapterincluding brazing methodsjoint microstructure and corresponding mechanical strengths. The suitability of a variety of brazing filler metals for Ti–Al intermetallics is also discussedand an extensive comparison is made between the brazing of traditional materials and those including more than three intermetallics.
Intermetallics display many unique physical and mechanical properties which have suggested that they may be useful as structural materials. Particularly noteworthy are high melting pointslow densitygood oxidation resistance (for aluminides and silicides)high strength at elevated temperaturesand high strain-hardening rates. Howeverlow-temperature strength of binary alloys is inadequateas are ductility and fracture toughness. Fortunatelythere are many methods available to strengthen and toughen intermetallicsincluding grain-size refinementmicroalloyingmacroalloyingand composite formation. To an unusual degreenovel processing techniques permit further latitude in alloy design. A particularly noteworthy feature of fracture behavior in some aluminides and silicides is a high propensity for environmental embrittlementespecially in the presence of water vaporhydrogenand oxygen. Fortunatelyseveral techniques are available to control such embrittlementincluding alloyingelimination of grain boundariesand the use of coatings such as oxides. Improvements in toughness increase the likelihood that intermetallics may be utilized in structuresespecially when high-temperature strength or corrosion resistance is required.
Intermetallics are compounds formed from two metals. Their crystal structure and properties are completely different from their parent metals [10]. Usually after the formation of an intermetallic alloya long range ordering is developed in the material. This long range ordering places restriction on the deformation modes. These restrictions usually are manifested as increased strength (at least at elevated temperatures)reduced ductility and fracture toughness [11]. Apart from titanium aluminidesexamples of other intermetallics include NiAland FeAl.
14.6.1 General properties of intermetallic compounds
In terms of their propertiesintermetallic compounds are generally regarded as a class of materials between metals and ceramics which arises from the bonding being a mixture of metallic and covalent. Intermetallics are intrinsically strong (and in the L12-ordered fcc compounds increases with temperature up to about 600°C) with high elastic modulus. The strong bonding and ordered structure also gives rise to lower self-diffusion coefficients and hence greater stability of diffusion-controlled properties. Some of the compounds of current interest are shown in Table 14.5. Intermetallics containing aluminium or silicon exhibit a resistance to oxidation and corrosion because of their adherent surface oxides. Those based on light elements have attractive low density giving rise to high specific properties particularly important in weight-saving applications.
Table 14.5. Comparison of Physical Properties of Some Intermetallic Compounds
Compound
Crystal Structure
Melting Temperature (°C)
Density (kg m−3)
Young’s Modulus/Density
Ni3Al
L12 (ordered fcc)
1400
7500
45
Ni3Si
L12 (ordered fcc)
1140
7300
NiAl
B2 (ordered bcc)
1640
5860
35
Ti3Si
D019 (ordered cph)
1600
4200
50
TiAl
L10 (ordered tetragonal)
1460
3910
24
FeAl
B2 (ordered bcc)
1300
5560
47
Like ceramicshoweverthe greatest disadvantage of intermetallics is their low ductilityparticularly at low and intermediate temperatures. The reasons for the lack of ductility vary from compound to compound but include (i) a limited number of easy deformation modes to satisfy the von Mises criterion(ii) operation of dislocations with large slip vectors(iii) restricted cross-slip(iv) difficulty of transmitting slip across grain boundaries(v) intrinsic grain boundary weakness(vi) segregation of deleterious solutes to grain boundaries(vii) covalent bonding and high Peierls–Nabarro stress and (viii) environmental susceptibility. It has been demonstratedhoweverthat some intermetallics can be ductilized by small alloying additions: Ni3Al with boronTiAl with MnTi3Al with Nb. This observation has encouraged recent research and development of intermetallics and the possibility of application of those materials.
14.6.2 Nickel aluminides
Ni3Al (nickel aluminide) is the ordered fcc γ′-phase and is a major strengthening component in superalloys. Ni3Al single crystals are reasonably ductile but in polycrystalline form are quite brittle and fail by intergranular fracture at ambient temperatures. The basic slip system is {1 1 1} ⟨1 1 0⟩ and has more than five independent slip modes but still exhibits grain boundary brittleness. Remarkablysmall additions of ~0.1 at.% boron produce elongations up to 50%. General explanations for this effect are that B segregates to grain boundaries and (i) increases the cohesive strength of the boundary and (ii) disorders the grain boundary region so that dislocation pile-up stresses can be relieved by slip across the boundary rather than by cracking. This general explanation is no doubt of significance but additionallythere are distinct microstructural changes within the grains which must lead to a reduced friction stress and ease the operation of polyslip. For examplethe addition of B reduces the occurrence of stacking fault defects. Addition of solutessuch as Bare not expected to raise the stacking fault energy and hencethis effect possibly arises from the segregation of B to dislocationspreventing the superdislocation dissociation reactions (see Section 4.9).
Microhardness measurements inside grains and away from grain boundaries indeed show that boron softens the grains. The ductilization effect is limited to nickel-rich aluminides and cannot be produced by carbon or other elementsalthough some substitutional solutes such as Pdwhich substitutes for Niand Cu produce a small improvement in elongation. Small additions of FeMn and Hf have also been claimed to improve fabricability. Grain size has been shown to influence the yield stress according to the Hall–Petch equationand B appears to lower the slope ky and facilitate slip across grain boundaries. These alloys are also known to be environmentally sensitive. Hffor examplewhich does not segregate to grain boundaries but still improves ductilityhas a large misfit (11%) and possibly traps H from environmental reactionssuch as Al+H2O→Al2O3+H. Tiwhich has a small misfitdoes not improve the ductility.
The most striking property of Ni3Al is the increasing yield stress with increasing temperature up to the peak temperature of 600°C (Figure 14.17). This behaviour is also observed in other L12intermetallicsparticularly Ni3Si and Zr3Al. This effect results from the thermally activated cross-slip of screw dislocations from the {1 1 1} planes to the {1 0 0} cube planes where the apb energy is somewhat lower. The glide of superdislocations is made more difficult by the formation of Kear–Wilsdorf (K–W) locks (see Chapter 11)and their frequency increases with temperature. Electron microscopy measurements of apb energies given in Table 14.6 shows that the apb energy on {1 0 0} decreases with aluminium contentand this influences the composition dependence of the strengthshown in Figure 14.17. The cross-slip of screw dislocations from the {1 1 1} planes to cube planes also gives rise to a high work hardening rate.
Figure 14.17. Effect of aluminium content on the temperature dependence of the flow stress in Ni3Al.
After Noguchi et al. (1981).
Table 14.6. Anti-Phase Boundary Energies in Ni3Al
Alloy
γ111 (mJ m−2)
γ100 (mJ m−2)
γ111/γ100
Ni–23.5Al
183±12
157±8
1.17
Ni–24.5Al
179±15
143±7
1.25
Ni–25.5Al
175±13
134±8
1.31
Ni–26.5Al
175±12
113±10
1.51
Ni–23.5Al+0.25B
170±13
124±8
1.37
Although the study of creep in γ′-based materials is limitedit does appear to be inferior to that of superalloys. Above 0.6Tm creep displays the characteristic primary and secondary stageswith steady-state creep having a stress exponent of approximately 4 and an activation energy of around 400 kJ mol−1consistent with climb being the rate-controlling process. At intermediate temperatures (i.e. around the 600°C peak in the yield stress curve) the creep behaviour does not display the three typical stages. Insteadafter primary creepthe rate continuously increases with creep straina feature known as inverse creep. In primary creepplanar dissociation leads to an initial high creep rate which slows as the screws dissociate on {1 0 0} planes to form K–W locks. Howeverit is the mobile edge dislocations which contribute most to the primary creep strainand their immobilization by climb dissociation which brings about the exhaustion of primary creep. The inverse creep regime is still not fully researched but could well be caused by glide on the {1 0 0} planes of the cross-slipped screw components.
The fatigue life in high-cycle fatigue is related to the influence of temperature on the yield stress and is invariant with temperature up to about 800°Cbut falls off for higher temperatures with cracks propagating along slip planes. With boron doping the fatigue resistance is very sensitive to aluminium content and decreases substantially as Al increases from 24 to 26 at.%. Neverthelesscrack growth rates of Ni3Al+B are lower than for commercial alloys.
Hyperstoichiometric Ni3Al with boron can be prepared by either vacuum melting and casting or from powders by HIPing. Fabrication into sheets is possible with intermediate anneals at 1000°C. At presenthoweverthe application of Ni3Al is not significant; Ni3Al powders are used as bond coats to improve adherence of thermal spray coatings. NeverthelessNi3Al alloys have been tested as heating elementsdiesel engine componentsglass-making moulds and hot-forging diesslurry-feed pumps in coal-fired boilershot-cutting wires and rubber extruders in the chemical industry. Ni3Al-based alloys as matrix materials for composites are also being investigated.
Nickel aluminide (NiAl) has a caesium chloride or ordered β-brass structure and exists over a very wide range of composition either side of the stoichiometric 50/50 composition. It has a high melting point of 1600°C and exhibits a good resistance to oxidation. Even with such favourable properties it has not been commercially exploited because of its unfavourable mechanical properties. Because it is strongly orderedlow-temperature deformation occurs by an a⟨1 0 0⟩ dislocation vector and not by a/2⟨1 1 1⟩ superdislocations. {1 1 0} ⟨1 0 0⟩ slip therefore leads to insufficient slip modes to satisfy the general plasticity criterionand in the polycrystalline condition β-NiAl is extremely brittle. The ductility does improve with increasing temperature but above 500°C the strength drops off considerably as a result of extensive glide and climb. Improvements in properties are potentially possible by refinement of the grain size and by using alloying additions to promote ⟨1 1 1⟩ slipas in FeAlwhich has the same structure. In this respectadditions of FeCr or Mn appear to be of interest. For high-temperature applicationsternary additions of Nb and Ta have been shown to improve creep strength through the precipitation of second phasesand mechanical alloying with yttria or alumina is also beneficial.
A further commercial problem of this material is that conventional production by casting and fabrication is difficultbut production through a powder route followed by either HIPing or hot extrusion is more promising.
14.6.3 Titanium aluminides
Because of the limited scope for improvements in the properties of conventional titanium alloys above 650°Ceither by alloy development or by TMPincreased attention is being given to the titanium intermetallicsTi3Al (α2-phase) and TiAl (γ-phase). With low densityhigh modulus and good creep and oxidation resistance up to 900°C they have considerable potential if the poor ductility at ambient temperatures could be improved. A comparison of Ti3Al- and TiAl-based materials with conventional Ti-alloys is given in Table 14.7.
Table 14.7. Comparison of Super α2 and γ Alloys with Conventional Titanium Alloys
Property
Titanium Alloys
(α2+β)
(γ+α2)
Density (g cm−3)
4.54
4.84
4.04
Estiffness (GN m−2)
110
145
176
RT tensile strength (MN m−2)
1100
620
HT (760°C) tensile strength (MN m−2)
620
550
Maximum creep temperature (°C)
540
730
900
RT ductility (%)
20
4–6
3
Service temperature ductility (%)
High
5–12
5–12
Electron microscopy studies of Ti3Al or α2 have shown that deformation by slip occurs at room temperature by coupled pairs of dislocations with which glide only on planes and by very limited glide on with pairs of dislocation with . The ductility increases at higher temperatures due to climb of the dislocations and to the increased glide mobility of and dislocations through thermal activation. Only limited activity of the {0 0 0 1} slip systems is observedeven at high temperatures.
The most successful improvements in the ductility of Ti3Al have been produced by the addition of β-stabilizing elementsparticularly niobiumto produce α2-alloys. An addition of 4 at.% Nb produces significant slip on and as well as some slip on {1 0 1 1}⟨1 1 2 0⟩. This improvement is attributed to the decrease in covalency as Nb substitutes for Ti with a consequent reduction in the Peierls–Nabarro friction stress. Alloys based on α2 are Ti–(23–25)Al–(8–18)Nbof which Ti–24Al–11Nb has excellent spalling resistance. Most Ti3Al+Nb alloyssuch as super α2also contain other β-stabilizers including Mo and Vi.e. Ti–25Al–10Nb–3V–1Mowhich exhibits about 7% room temperature elongation. Alloying Ti3Al with β-stabilizing elements to produce two-phase alloys significantly increases the fracture strength. These Ti3Al-based alloys can be plasma-melted and cast followed by TMP in the (α2+β) or β-range. The improved ductility of Ti3Al alloys has led to aerospace applications in after-burners in jet engines where it compares favourably in performance with superalloys and gives a 40% weight saving.
Developments are taking place in rapid solidification processing to include a second phase (e.g. rare-earth precipitates) and to provide powderswhich may be consolidated by HIPingto produce fully dense components with properties comparable to wrought products. There are also developments in intermetallic matrix composites by the addition of SiC or Al2O3 fibres (~10 µm). These have some attractive propertiesbut the fibre–intermetallic interface is still a problem.
The γ-phase Ti–(50–56)Al has an ordered fc tetragonal (L10) structure up to the m.p. 1460°C with c/a=1.02 (Figure 14.18). Deformation by slip occurs on {1 1 1} planes andbecause of the tetragonalitythere are two types of dislocationsnamelyordinary dislocations 1/2⟨1 1 0⟩ and superdislocations ⟨0 1 1⟩=1/2 ⟨0 1 1⟩+1/2⟨0 1 1⟩. Another superdislocation 1/2⟨1 1 2⟩ has also been reported.
Figure 14.18. Structure of (a) TiAl (L10) and (b) (1 1 1) plane showing slip vectors for possible dissociation reactionse.g. ordinary dislocations 1/2[110]superdislocations [0 1 1] and 1/2[1 1 2]and twin dislocations 1/6[1 1 2].
After Kim and Froes (1990).
At room temperaturedeformation occurs by both ordinary and superdislocations. However[0 1 1] and [1 0 1] superdislocations are largely immobile because segments of the trailing superpartials 1/6⟨1 1 2⟩-type form faulted dipoles. The dissociated 1/2⟨1 1 0⟩ dislocations bounding complex stacking faults are largely sessile because of the Peierls–Nabarro stress. Some limited twinning also occurs. The flow stress increases with increasing temperature up to 600°C as the superpartials become mobile and cross-slip from {1 1 1} to {1 0 0} to form K–W-type locksthe 1/2⟨1 1 0⟩ slip activity increases and twinning is promoted.
The two-phase (γ+α2) Ti–Al alloys have better ductility than single-phase γ with a maximum at 48 at.% Al. This improvement has been attributed to the reduced c/a with decreased Alfurther promotion of twinning and the scavenging of O2 and N2 interstitials by α2. The combination of high stiffness (E=175 GPa at 20°C to 150 GPa at 700°C)density-normalized strength similar to cast Ni-based alloyshigh temperature strength and reasonable oxidation resistance to 750°Clow thermal expansion coefficientand high thermal conductivityhave led to the high level of interest in TiAl-based alloys. The major limitations to their application are the intrinsic low room temperature ductility (no better than 2–3%)the low fracture toughness (between 10 and 20 MPa m1/2 at 20°C) and the high growth rate of fatigue cracks.
Alloy and process development have resulted in some successful applications of these alloys over the last 10 or so years. Cast turbochargers are now manufactured in Japan for cars and wrought exhaust valves were used in formula 1 cars for some years. Major applications for these alloys are still awaited despite the success of these two applications; the high cost of processing is holding commercial developments back. In the case of thermo-mechanical processing the costs are high because the alloys are strong at normal hot working temperatures and because some sort of protection (such as canning with steel) from oxidation must be used during working. In the case of castings the efficiency of material usage is very lowboth because casting technology is not efficient and because melting and casting are difficult because of the reactivity of molten TiAl-based alloys.
The compositions of TiAl-based alloys which are of commercial interest lie within the range of about Ti45–48Al (at.%)but all alloys contain other elements in attempts to improve the properties of the binary alloy. Additions of Nb between about 5 and 8 at.% are important in improving oxidation resistance and also imparting some solid solution strengthening.
An understanding of the microstructures which can be obtained in cast or in wrought products of TiAl-based alloys requires knowledge of the phase changes that occur over the temperature range from the melting point to room temperature. The relevant part of the binary phase diagram between Ti and Al is shown in Figure 14.19 which also indicates schematically the influence of some alloying additions on phase boundaries.
Figure 14.19. Partial Ti–Al phase diagram showing the influence of ternary additions on the position of the various boundaries.
Courtesy M.H. Loretto.
The various phase transformations in the Ti–Al system offer the possibility of microstructural control both for the wrought route and for the casting route. Thus cooling samples containing less than about 44 at.% Al the solidification will take place through the formation of βwhich may or may not be removed via the peritectic reaction. Subsequent cooling of the α-phase results in precipitation of γwhich under typical cooling rates encountered with castingsresults in the formation of a lamellar structure. This ‘fully lamellar’ structure consists of parallel lamellae of γ and α and of twinned γ. These lamellae are formed on the (0 0 0 1) plane of the α-phase and thustheir length is defined by the pre-existing α-grain size. Somewhat slower cooling results in some of the γ-lamellae coarsening at colony boundaries to form γ-grains through local growth of the lamellaeto form a ‘near-fully lamellar’ structure. Hot working in the two-phase region results in the formation of equiaxed γ- and α-grains; the ratio of the amounts being defined by the average alloy composition and the hot working temperature. Subsequent cooling results in the equiaxed α-grains forming lamellae to yield a duplex microstructureor if extensive hot working is used a structure consisting of γ- and α-grains is formedtermed ‘near-γ’.
If the cooling rate is increasedas in oil or water quenchingthe α-phase transforms massively to γ if the Al content is above about 44 at.% (below this Al contentα is retained)and this transformation offers a further opportunity for microstructural control in cast samples by heat treating in the two-phase field so that α can precipitate on all four {1 1 1} planesthroughout the γ-grains. The tendency to transform massively is strongly dependent upon the composition which has important consequences upon the choice of alloy composition in cast samples.
14.6.4 Other intermetallic compounds
A number of intermetallic compounds are already used in areas which do not rely on stringent mechanical properties. Fe3Alfor exampleis used in fossil fuel plants where resistance to both sulphur attack and oxidation is important. Ni3Si is used where resistance to hot sulphuric acid is required. There are several compounds with rare earth elements used in magnet technology (see Chapter 8). PdIn is gold-coloured and a possible dental material. Zr3Al has a low neutron capture cross-section and is a possible reactor material.
The β-compound NiTi (Nitinol) is an important shape memory alloy. The SME manifests itself when the alloy is deformed into a shape while in a low-temperature martensitic condition but regains its original shape when the stress is removedand it is heated above the martensitic regime. Strains of the order of 8% can be completely recovered by the reverse transformation of the deformed martensitic phase to the higher temperature parent phase. The martensite transformation in these alloys is a thermoelastic martensitic transformation in which the martensite plates form and grow continuously as the temperature is lowered and are removed reversibly as the temperature is raised. NiTi was one of the original SME alloysbut there are many copper-based alloys which undergo a martensitic transformatione.g. Cu–17Zr–7Al. Application of SME alloys relies on the characteristic that they can change shape repeatedly as a result of heating and cooling and exert a force as the shape changes. By composition control (increasing the Ni content or substitution of Cu lowers the Ms temperature of TiNi)the shape memory can be triggered by normal body temperature or any other convenient temperature to operate a device. Several biomedical applications have been developed in orthopaedic devices (e.g. pulling fractures together)in orthodonticsin intrauterine contraceptives and in artificial hearts. Industrial applications include pipe couplings for ships which shrink during heatingelectrical connectorsservo-mechanisms for driving recording pensswitchesactuators and thermostats.
Guided by the concept of isolated surface active sitesbulk intermetallic compounds (IMC) have been studied in selective hydrogenation. An intermetallic compound designates a chemical compound consisting of two metallic elements (or more)which adopts at least partly an ordered crystal structure that differs from those of the constituent metals. An intermetallic compound is a single-phase material that often holds a wide homogeneity range while an “alloy” is a mixture of metals that can contain more than one phase. Depending on the compositiona given bimetallic system can contain both intermetallic and alloy phases. This is for instance the case of the Ni–Zn system (88).
Pd associated with nonhydrogenating element of the class of the post-transition metals can form intermetallic phases. PdGa is the first bulk IMC (unsupported) studied in selective hydrogenation of alkynes/alkadienes. Compared to Pdit is highly selective to ethylene in hydrogenation of acetylene and is much more stable on reaction stream (89). One can also cite Pt3Ge which gives a higher selectivity to butenes than Pt in the hydrogenation of 1,3-butadiene (90). Many other bulk IMCs have been then studied in these reactionsand interestinglyalso low-cost nonnoble metalssuch as several CoGen(91)NimSnn(92,93)NiZn (94)Ni3Ga (93) (where m and n are integer numbers). The reader can refer to several reviews for more information (88,95–97). The high selectivity of the IMCs is attributed to the ordered surfacewhich increases the distances between two metal active sites and isolate them from each other. Electronic effects due the proximity of the second metal can also intervene. The counterpart is the low ability of IMCs to dissociate H2which leads to rather low activity in hydrogenation reactions.
Their study as supported IMC catalysts or bimetallic NPs with composition corresponding to nominal IMC formulas is more recentbut is developing rapidly. Catalytic results obtained with supported Pd-based intermetallics are given firstfollowed by a few examples obtained with supported nonnoble Ni-based intermetallics.
6.1 Pd-based intermetallic catalysts
6.1.1 PdGa catalysts
A supported PdGa catalyst was compared to bulk PdGa in selective hydrogenation of acetylene (98) (Table A8). The supported PdGa catalyst was obtained from a layered double hydroxide (LDH)Pd0.025Mg0.675Ga0.3(OH)2(CO3)0.15·mH2Othat is decomposed in H2 at 550 °Cand leads to the formation of PdGa nanoparticles of 6.7 nm supported on the MgO–MgGa2O4 mixed oxide. According to HRTEM and XPSan intermetallic Pd2Ga compound forms. After a slow but strong activation during the first 23 h of reaction at 200 °C leading an increasing conversion from < 5% to 98% (no explanation is given for this)the activity of this catalyst in selective hydrogenation of acetylene in excess of ethylene is ∼ 5000 times higher than over bulk Pd2Gaand the selectivity to ethylene is only slightly lower for the supported catalyst (70% at 98% acetylene conversion) than for the bulk phase (74% at 94% conversion).
In another studyAl2O3-supported PdGa and Pd2Ga catalysts have been compared to a commercial 5%Pd/Al2O3 in hydrogenation of acetylene in excess of ethylene at 200 °Cwith an initial conversion close to 100% (99). The catalysts were prepared by deposition of NPs preformed in liquid phase and annealed in an organic solvent at 250 °C to generate the intermetallic structures according to XRD (Table A8). The PdGa and Pd2Ga/Al2O3 are much more selective (70–80% at ∼ 90% conversion) than the Pd catalyst (15%). In additionthey are much more stable as they lose only a few % conversion over 20 h of reactionand the selectivity remains stable whereas Pd deactivates to 45% conversion and selectivity increases to 20%. The authors also report that the specific activity of PdGa and Pd2Ga/Al2O3 is considerably higher than their respective bulk IMC (factor of 35,000 and 1300respectively)and close to that of Pd/Al2O3but with a much higher selectivity.
Another PdGa catalyst prepared differently exhibits the same trend. PdGa was supported on a mixed oxide after [PdCl4]2 − adsorption on MgGaAl-LDH supported on Al2O3 and decomposition in H2 at 550 °C (100) (Table A8). The results of HRTEMXPSCO-IR and TPR show that bimetallic PdGa NPs are formed on MgO–Al2O3 with two compositionsPd/Ga = 2/1 and 1/5. The catalysts exhibit comparable activity as monometallic Pd/MgO–Al2O3but with a much higher selectivity to ethylene in hydrogenation of acetylene in excess of ethylene at 45 °C: at 90% conversionthe selectivity to ethylene is 55%75% and 82% over PdPdGa(2:1) and PdGa(1:5)respectivelybut it drops down at 100% conversion (Fig. 6). The higher selectivity of PdGa(1:5) is attributed to the higher number of Ga atoms surrounding Pd that isolates them from each otherand facilitates the desorption of ethene from the surface of catalysts. The PdGa/MgO–Al2O3 catalysts are stable during the 48 h reaction; the stability is attributed to the “net trap confinement effect” of the support (see Scheme 3 in Section 4.2)which inhibit the migration and aggregation of the PdGa NPs.
Fig. 6. Conversion of acetylene conversion (A) and selectivity to ethylene (B) as a function of the reaction temperature; conversion versus time-on-stream at 45 °C (C) over different catalysts Pd/MgO–Al2O3 (Ablack)PdGa(2:1)/MgO–Al2O3 (Bblue); PdGa(1:5)/MgO–Al2O3 (Cgreen) (in competitive conditions of reaction) (100).
Reprinted from HeY.; LiangL.; LiuY.; FengJ.; MaC.; LiD. J. Catal.2014309166–173Copyright (2014)with permission from Elsevier.
6.1.2 PdIn catalysts
Another Pd-based intermetallic system is PdIn. A bulk Pd2In compound has been tested in the semihydrogenation of acetylene (101). It reveals excellent stability and slightly higher selectivity to ethene (80%) than Pd2Ga (75%). As the electronic structure of Pd2In and Pd2Ga shows only small differencesthe authors conclude that the selectivity to ethene is mainly governed by the active-site isolation. A supported bimetallic PdIn/Al2O3 catalysts was prepared by co-impregnation (Pd/In = 1.3) (102) (Table A8). After reduction at 150 °CXRDHRTEM and STEM-EDS line-scan profiles indicate the formation of an intermetallic PdIn phase. Compared to Pd/Al2O3PdIn/Al2O3 exhibits higher activityselectivity and stability. It is much more selective to etheneespecially at acetylene conversion close to 100%i.e.65% versus 40%. CO-IR and XPS indicate an electron transfer from In to Pdwhich weakens the adsorption of ethylene on the Pd sitesinhibits the formation of Pd hydrideand therefore contributes to the higher selectivity. On the other handthe activation of H2 is facilitated owing to the weak adsorption of acetylene on PdIn/Al2O3and the smaller size of the PdIn NPs (2.7 nm versus 4 nm for Pd/Al2O3) enhances the activity. Green oil formation is inhibited by the presence of indiumwhich contributes to the enhanced stability of the catalyst. Both characterization and kinetics investigation indicate that the good catalytic performance of the bimetallic catalyst originates from the different extents of electronic and/or geometric modification of the Pd active sites with respect to the monometallic Pd catalyst.
6.1.3 PdSn catalysts
PdSn/γ-Al2O3 catalysts with Pd/Sn = 1 were prepared by sequential impregnation using either SnCl4 or tetrabutyltin (Sn(n-C4H9)4) as tin precursors for a study of hydrogenation of 1,3-butadiene in the presence or not of 1-butene (103) (Table A8). In the absence of 1-butenethe two PdSn/Al2O3 catalysts show almost the same activity as Pd/Al2O3 but a higher selectivity to butenes (~ 93% and ~ 97% with PdSn versus 82% with Pdconversions not mentioned)and with almost no deactivation for 8 h on stream at 100 °C (conversion not reported) (Fig. 7A). In the presence of 1-butenethe three catalysts are initially less active and deactivate faster with a deactivation rate that evolves as follows: Pd > PdSninorg > PdSnorgand they are less selective as n-butane is produced and a small fraction of 1-butene of the main stream is consumed (Fig. 7B). XAFS shows that the presence of Sn modifies the electronic and geometric structures of Pd. Tin addition inhibits the formation of the Pd β-hydride phasegenerates Pd–Sn bondsand reduces the size of Pd ensembles. This contributes to the increase in 1-butene selectivity and the decrease in the n-butane formation. Finallycarbonaceous species are formed in catalysts modified with organic tinwhile the inorganic tin precursor also generates oxide-like species in addition to making Sn–Pd bonds.
Fig. 7. Rate of 1,3-butadiene consumption (moles per second per mole of total Pd) (A) and selectivity to butenes (B) in hydrogenation of 1,3-butadiene (a) in the absence of 1-butene; (b) in the presence of 1-butene over PdSn/Al2O3 and Pd/Al2O3(103).
Reprinted from ChoiS. H.; LeeJ. S. J. Catal.2000193176–185Copyright (2000)with permission from Elsevier.
6.1.4 PdBi catalysts
Komatsu and Furukawa report in their review (95) a work they performed on a Pd3Bi/SiO2 catalystwhich shows a high selectivity to ethylene of 80% at 95% conversion in hydrogenation of acetylene in the presence of excess of ethylene. The high selectivity is explained by an electronic factor; CO-IR indicates a higher electron density on Pd atoms in Pd3Bi than in Pd catalysts that would make the adsorption of ethylene weakerresulting in its immediate desorption from Pd3Bi before it is further hydrogenated into ethane.
6.1.5 PdZn catalysts
Zhang et al. (104) report the formation of PdZn particles with a PdZn intermetallic structure according to XRDafter a 1%Pd/ZnO sample prepared by impregnation has been calcined and reduced at 400 °C (Table A8). The PdZn/ZnO catalyst is more active and selective in hydrogenation of acetylene to ethylene than 1%Pd/Al2O3 treated in the same conditions: ∼ 100% acetylene conversion for PdZn with 70% of selectivity to ethylene and 7% to ethane versus 85% conversion for Pd with 45% selectivity to ethylene and 30% to ethane at 60 °C. Playing with the space velocityPdZn can reach ∼ 100% conversion at 60 °C with ∼ 90% selectivity to ethylene. The addition of ethylene in the feed has little influence on the catalytic performance of the PdZn catalystbut a strong one on Pd/Al2O3 as its selectivity is strongly lower. The PdZn catalyst possesses long-term stability (20 h). The Pd–Zn–Pd surface ensembles of the intermetallic display an electron transfer from Zn to Pd according to CO-IR and XPS; results of microcalorimetry allow the authors to conclude that the higher selectivity of PdZn originates from the presence of single Pd sites on which ethylene is weakly π-bondedwhich inhibits the hydrogenation to undesired ethane. The single Pd active sites are also known to facilitate the dissociation of H2in a similar way as the isolated Pd sites alloyed by copper (27). The spatial arrangement of these Pd single sites allows acetylene adsorption with a moderate σ-bondingwhich results in the better activity than with monometallic Pd.
Mashkovskii et al. (105) and Mashkovsky et al. (106) also prepared PdZn catalysts with Pd/Zn = 1 supported on alumina or carboneither by impregnation of a heterobimetallic complex Pd–Zn(OAc)4(OH2) (I-PdZn)or by co-impregnation of two homonuclear complexesPd3(OAc)6 and Zn(OAc)2·2H2O (co-PdZn)and with the same Pd and Zn loadings (Table A8). The same behavior in hydrogenation of acetylene in excess of ethylene is observed with the two supports. Over all the Pd-based catalystsI-PdZnco-PdZn and monometallic Pdthe selectivity to ethylene decreases as the conversion to acetylene increases with the reaction temperature (Table 4). The activities of I-PdZnco-PdZn and Pd are very close to each otherbut the selectivity to ethylene is higher over I-PdZn. However when 100% conversion is reachedthe selectivities converge down to 15%. The higher selectivity of I-PdZn at 80% conversion cannot be explained by differences in metal particle size (see Table A8)so the authors propose that it is due to the fact that the particles in I-PdZn have a more homogeneous composition as attested by TEM. The addition of Zn affects the electronic structure of Pd and decreases the heat of adsorption of acetylene and ethylene.
Table 4. Evolution of the selectivity to ethylene as a function of acetylene conversion over PdZn/Al2O3 and Pd/Al2O3 catalysts (in competitive conditions of reaction) (105).
Catalyst
Particle size (nm)
Selectivity to ethylene (%)
T100% (°C)
At 15% conversion
At 80% conversion
At 100% conversion
Pd
1–2
70
20
15
120
co-PdZn
6–7
80
30
15
110
I-PdZn
8–15
90
50
15
100
6.2 Ni-based intermetallic catalysts
As already mentioned in Section 6.1the addition of Ga or In to Pd and the formation of intermetallic NPs improve the catalytic performance of Pd. In the following exampleIn has been added to Ni. NiIn/SiO2 catalysts were prepared by co-impregnation with Ni/In ratios between 1 and 10and reduced at 450 °C before selective hydrogenation of acetylene (107) (Table A9). The formation of NiIn alloy is attested by XRD and EDS line-scan profiles performed on single NPs. Although the reaction initiates at 100% conversion for all the catalysts (Fig. 8)the authors report that the NiIn/SiO2 catalysts and especially those with the Ni/In ratios of 6 and 10 show much higher acetylene conversionethylene selectivity and stability than Ni/SiO2although deactivation also occurs. The authors ascribe these results to the isolation of the active surface Ni atoms by the inert In ones and to charge transfer from In to Ni (according to XPS). These changes lower the adsorption strength of ethylene and restrain C–C hydrogenolysis and polymerization of acetylene and intermediate compounds. The authors also propose that the better stability of the catalysts results from the inhibition of the formation of nickel carbidewhich easily forms in Ni/SiO2. Howeveras the In content increasescarbonaceous deposit becomes the main reason for NiIn/SiO2 deactivation due to the enhanced acidity of the catalyst.
Fig. 8. Conversion of acetylene (A) and selectivity to ethylene (B) over Ni/SiO2 and NixIn/SiO2 with time on stream of acetylene and hydrogen at 180 °C (in not competitive conditions of reaction) (107).
Reprinted from ChenY.; ChenJ. Appl. Surf. Sci.201638716–27Copyright (2016)with permission from Elsevier.
Supported NiGe catalysts have also been studied. Particles of Ni3Ge were prepared inside the pores of a MCM-41 mesoporous silica (108): Ni was introduced first by template-ion exchange methodand Ge by CVD in flowing H2 at 0 °Cand the sample was reduced in H2 at 600 °C (Table A9). TEM shows that NiGe/MCM-41 mainly contains metallic particles (2–3 nm) smaller than the pore sizeXRD shows peaks of intermetallic Ni3Geand CO-IR indicates an electron transfer from Ni to Ge. Table 5 shows that Ni3Ge/MCM-41 exhibits much higher acetylene conversion and selectivity to ethylene than Ni/MCM-41. In additionthe selectivity to ethylene does not drop down as conversion increasesand the catalyst remains stable after 7 h of reaction. As in the case of the supported Pd-based IM catalyststhe good catalytic performance of Ni3Ge/MCM-41 is attributed to the expanded Ni–Ni atomic distance (geometric effect) but also to the decrease in electron density of the Ni atoms (electronic effect). This is at variance with the cases of the Pd IM catalysts and the NiIn/SiO2 catalysts described above and of the Ni IM catalysts described in the next examplefor which the electron density is higher on the Ni and Pd atoms in IM catalysts than in the monometallic Ni and Pd catalysts. Liu et al. (93) developed a strategy based on co-reduction to synthesize colloids of Ni3Ga and Ni3Sn2 before impregnation on MgAl2O4 support (Table A9). HRTEM techniques attest that the NPs are intermetallic. The Ni3Ga and Ni3Sn2/MgAl2O4 catalysts are stable during 24 h on stream at 200 °C and at conversion close to 100% with a high and stable selectivity to ethylene of 77% and 80%respectively. For comparisonthe selectivity to ethylene over a monometallic Pd/MgAl2O4 catalyst is much lower (12%) and the acetylene conversion decreases a littlefrom 100% to 94% in 24 h. The good catalytic performance is assigned to active-site isolation due the crystallographic structure of the IM NPs and the alteration of the Ni electronic structure in the Ni3Ga and Ni3Sn2 NPswith a higher electron density than in Ni catalysts.
Table 5. Acetylene conversion and selectivity to products obtained after 1 h on reaction stream at 250 °C over NiGe/MCM-41 and Ni/MCM-41 catalysts (not competitive conditions of reaction) (108).
Catalyst
C2H2 conversion (%)
Selectivity (C-%)
C2H4
C2H6
CH4
C3H6
C4H8
Others
Ni/MCM-41
16
67.8
7.0
1.1
6.2
12.6
5.3
Ni3Ge/MCM-41
94
89.0
2.2
0.1
0.2
8.4
0.1
6.3 Conclusion for the supported intermetallic catalysts
Supported intermetallic catalysts (M1/M2 close to 1) exhibit an excellent selectivity to alkenes in semihydrogenation reactions and high stability during long-term reactions. In most of the studies citedthese properties are obtained at 100% conversion or close to. Howeverin some casesthe selectivity to alkene drops down when conversion increases. For most of the Pd-based catalyststhe activity is as good as the Pd counterpart. The Ni-based catalysts are much less active (higher reaction temperatures are needed). The overall improvement of the catalytic performances of supported intermetallic catalysts is assigned to active-site isolation (geometric effect) due the intrinsic crystallographic structure of the intermetallic and even in the alloy when the intermetallic does not form in the nanoparticles. It is also attributed to the alteration of the electronic structure of the hydrogenating metal with a higher electron density.