×
注意!页面内容来自https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/in-or-under-the-sea-submarine.3127850/,本站不储存任何内容,为了更好的阅读体验进行在线解析,若有广告出现,请及时反馈。若您觉得侵犯了您的利益,请通知我们进行删除,然后访问 原网页
That is not a sentence. If it were turned into a sentencethen it might be "This adventure takes place 20,000 leagues below the surface of the sea."How about "20,000 leagues under the sea"?
But "under the sea" means in the earth.If you are you wanting to say it is submergedunder would be better.
Noit does not. It means "below the surface of the sea". Which is also what "submarine" means.But "under the sea" means in the earth.
So would you accept that it's fine to use "under the sea" in the following?Noit does not. It means "below the surface of the sea". Which is also what "submarine" means.
Would you find the line acceptable if it is found in a children's story?Sounds odd unless it's talking about dwellers on the ocean floor. I prefer 'in' here.
EB: //Under the seaa lot of fish are playing around a reef.//
Can I picture a reef as being at the bottom of the searight on the sea bedand therefore reasonably say "Under the sea" in my sentence about the fish playing around a coral reef?Under the sea a lot of fishes are playing around a reef. A reef isn't exactly "under the sea" though. Fishes spend their time "in the sea"as far as I know. Even in shallow rock poolsI'd say they are "in the water".
By "a lot of fishes"do you mean "many different species of fish"?Under the sea a lot of fishes are playing around a reef. A reef isn't exactly "under the sea" though. Fishes spend their time "in the sea"as far as I know. Even in shallow rock poolsI'd say they are "in the water".
"20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" refers to a total distance traveled. It's not about how far under the water they are but about how far they traveled under the water at all. 20,000 leagues is 60,000 miles and 96,000 km
An Octopus's Garden is though.A reef isn't exactly "under the sea" though.
I'm in this camp - with emphasis on the 'could'.The other camp thinks "under the sea" could mean "below the surface of the sea"perhaps taking a more poetic approach.