When mirrorless cameras started to replace DSLRsthere were still many advantages of a DSLR over mirrorless. Now that mirrorless cameras have maturedthere are very few clear technical advantages of using a DSLRalthough DSLRs are still very capable for most types of photography.
Can’t decide between a mirrorless and a DSLR camera? In this comprehensive articlewe will take a close look at pros and cons of both DSLR and mirrorless cameras in detail and provide some recommendations on which route to take in the future. Sowhat is the role of the DSLR in a mirrorless world? How do these two types of cameras compare today?
Table of Contents
The DSLR
DSLR (digital single lens reflex) cameras have a mechanical mirrora phase-detection autofocus systemand an optical viewfinder with a pentamirror or pentaprism design. We describe DSLRs in detail in our article on What Is a DSLRso if you’re new to the conceptI recommend reading that article first.
DSLRs are a continuation of SLR cameras that were initially developed for film. When digital sensors evolvedcamera companies treated them a lot like film and housed them in the same type of mechanical body. Many aspects of a DSLR’s construction are similar to that of a film SLR.
While technological advances eventually led to new features added to DSLRs (GPSWiFiHDRetc)DSLRs continued to stay bulky and mechanically complexmostly due to the optical viewfinder. After alla DSLR’s optical viewfinder only works thanks to a reflex mirror in front of the camera sensorwhich reflects light into a pentaprism or pentamirror above the sensoroutputting in the viewfinder. All of these components are large and bulky. Despite the best efforts of companies like Canon and NikonDSLRs could only get so small.
Just as importantlycamera manufacturers wanted their existing lenses to remain compatible with digital camerasin order to ease the transition from film to digital. The problem is that this confined DSLRs to certain sizes and shapes in order to maintain compatibility with legacy lenses. (Specificallythe lens mount and the flange distance needed to stay the same dimensions as before.) This once again prevented camera companies from slimming down their DSLRs.
StillDSLRs became wildly popular in the digital ageespecially before smartphones caught up to being “good enough” for a lot of non-pro photographers. For yearshigh-quality photography was practically interchangeable with the DSLR. It’s only in recent years that mirrorless cameras have begun to outpace them.
DSLR Camera Advantages
Even in a mirrorless worldDSLRs still have some advantages:
- Beautiful optical viewfinder: Mirrorless cameras (and their electronic viewfinders) will never be able to replicate the experience of an optical viewfinder: naturalinstantaneousthrough-the-lensand real.
- Long battery life: Because the optical viewfinder isindeed, optical instead of electronicit requires almost no power to run. Only the little displays like camera settings draw any power. SoDSLRs have great battery lifeso long as you use their viewfinder and not their rear LCD screen.
- Low used prices: Many people are switching to mirrorless camerasso it’s easy to get a great deal on a lightly-used DSLR.

DSLR Camera Limitations
Due to the mirror dependency of DSLRsthey have the following limitations:
- Size and bulk: The viewfinder system needs space for both the mirror and the prismwhich means that DSLRs will always have a pretty deep camera body and a protruding top. It also means that the viewfinder must be fixed in the same spot on every DSLRin line with the optical axis and digital sensor – basicallythere is no other place to put it. As a resultmost DSLRs have somewhat similar exterior looks.
- Weight: Large size and bulk also translates to more weight. While most entry-level DSLRs have plastic bodies and internal components to make them lighterthere’s only so small a DSLR can be.
- Complex mirror and shutter design: Every time you take a photo with a DSLRthe mirror must move out of the way to allow light to hit the camera sensor. This alone creates a number of issues:
- Mirror slap: DSLR cameras produce quite a bit of noise and vibration when the mirror moves out of the way. Although manufacturers have been coming up with creative ways to reduce this issue (Nikon’s “Quiet” mode for example)it is still a problem. For tripod-based photographyyou will often want to use “Mirror Lock-Up” or “Exposure Delay” to allow mirror to be liftedthen exposure taken after a set delay – all to reduce mirror-induced vibrations.
- Frame speed limitation: Modern mirror and shutter mechanisms are very impressivebut they are limited by the physical speed at which the mirror flips up and down. For examplewhen the Nikon D6 fires at 14 frames per secondthe mirror goes up and down 14 times within each secondwith the shutter opening and closing in between! This means there needs to be perfect synchronization of both the mirror and the shutter. Take a look at this video that shows this in slow motion. It’s an amazing technologybut it’s expensiveand it severely limits the frames per second of most cameras.
- Expensive to build and support: The mirror mechanism is complex and consists of dozens of different parts. Because of thatit is expensive to build and provide technical support if anything goes wrong. Disassembling a DSLR and replacing internal components can be very time-consuming for a service center.
- No exposure preview in the viewfinder: When looking through an optical viewfinder (OVF)it is impossible to see exactly what the final image will look like. You have to look at the camera meter (which can be fooled in some situations) or the LCD in live view mode if you want an idea of the exposure.
- Secondary mirror and phase detection accuracy: DSLR cameras with a phase-detection autofocus system require a secondary mirror. I wrote about this in detail in my “how phase-detection AF works” article. The problem with the secondary mirror is that it has to be positioned at a perfect angle and distance for phase detection autofocus to work accurately. If there is even a slight deviationit will result in missed focus. And even worsethe phase detection sensors and the secondary mirror have to stay perfectly parallel to each other. If they don’tsome autofocus points might be accuratewhile others will constantly miss focus.
- Phase detection and lens calibration issues: The same problem with phase-detection systems extends to camera lenseswhich need to be properly calibrated for each DSLR body. If you have autofocus problems on a DSLRvery oftensupport techs will ask the lens in question to be sent together with the camera body. If the technician adjusts your lens to their standard camera environment and your camera is slightly offyour issues might get even worse after such tuning.
- Complexity: Although manufacturers have gotten much more efficient over the years in terms of DSLR productionassembling the mirror mechanism is no easy task. Lots of moving components mean high precision assembly systemsthe need for lubrication in areas where metal components rub against each otherand so on. In turnthis all results in increased manufacturing costs. DSLR cameras are relatively inexpensive because they’ve been around for a whileand camera companies have honed their manufacturingbut they’re still more mechanically complex than a mirrorless camera.

The Mirrorless Camera
Fundamentallythe only thing a mirrorless camera does differently than a DSLR is remove the mirror. But that one change allows mirrorless cameras much more flexibility in their design and featuresnot to mention reduce the number of moving parts in the camera (helpful for reducing the camera’s priceeither for the manufacturerconsumeror both).
Any camera without a mirror is technically a mirrorless cameraincluding something like a smartphone. Howeverthe term “mirrorless” is usually a shortened way of referring to “mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras,” AKA mirrorless ILCs. Like the DSLRyou can change lenses on a mirrorless camera in order to expand your creative options.
With the rise of mirrorless cameras (a phenomenon that gradually picked up steam in the late 2010s)most camera manufacturers except Pentax have have transitioned away from DSLRs. Although some DSLR models are still available from Nikon and Canonneither company has produced a new DSLR in a while. They’re focused on mirrorless.

Mirrorless Camera Advantages
Mirrorless cameras have opened up huge opportunities for innovation and have solved many of the problems of traditional DSLRs. They’re still not perfect camerasbut these are some of their main advantages:
- Smaller size and lighter weight: Removing the mirror and the pentaprism frees up a lot of space. This means that mirrorless cameras can be designed to be smallerless bulkyand lighter compared to DSLRs. Not every mirrorless camera is lighter than every DSLR (see the Nikon Z9Panasonic S1Rand Canon EOS R3 for three examples of large mirrorless cameras). But they’re definitely lighter on average. Here’s an example of the weight savings between a DSLR versus comparable mirrorless cameras:
DSLR Comparable Mirrorless Weight Savings Canon 5D Mark IV Canon R5 152g (5.4oz) Canon 7DII Canon R7 298g (10.5oz) Nikon D850 Nikon Z7II 300g (10.6oz) Nikon D6 Nikon Z9 110g (3.9oz) - No mirror mechanism: There are a few benefits here:
- Quieter: No more mirror slapand if you are using an electronic shutteryou can shoot almost completely silently.
- Less camera shake: The only physical component in the mirrorless camera that can cause vibrations is the camera shutter. And even thenit is possible to use electronic shutter to completely get rid of camera shake from the shutter mechanism. (Some DSLRs can do this in live view.)
- Easier to clean: If dust ends up on the sensorcleaning mirrorless cameras is easier than DSLRs. It’s easier to see a mirrorless sensor when cleaning itand dust that you remove (saywith a rocket blower) doesn’t settle back into the camera chamber as easily.
- Very fast FPS speed: Unlike DSLRs which topped out at around 10-14 frames per secondmirrorless cameras can shoot at 20fps30fpsor even higher numbers like 120fps for still photographysince there’s no mirror that needs to move for every photo.
- Cheaper to build and support: With fewer moving partsa camera can be priced more competitively. We have seen this with the Nikon Z9which lacks a mirror and has no physical shutter curtainwhile costing less than its competitors.
- Can use the EVF while shooting video: Since mirrorelss cameras use an EVF that is a direct feed from the sensorit is possible to shoot video while looking through the viewfinderwhich is a major problem with DSLRs.
- Better and smarter autofocus: It took a while for mirrorless to catch up to DSLRs for autofocus capabilitiesbut we’re now at the point where the average mirrorless camera arguably beats the average DSLR for autofocus. Mirrorless cameras have hybrid phase-contrast detect systems not found on most DSLRsand camera companies are now putting most of their autofocus R&D into mirrorless cameras. The artificial-intelligence autofocus systems and subject-detection on modern mirrorless cameras are a sight to behold.
- Wider spread of autofocus points: Most DSLR cameras have a limited number of focus points that are distributed mostly around the center of the frame. What do you do if you need to move the focus point to an extreme border of the frame? The only option is to focus and recomposewhich isn’t a perfect technique. With mirrorless camerasautofocus points are distributed across the frameso even if your subject is in the very corneryou can easily focus on it. (Some DSLRs have this option in live viewbut live view autofocus speed/tracking is a joke on most DSLRs.)
- Image preview in the viewfinder: With mirrorless camerasyou can get an exact preview of your photos in the viewfinder. In other wordsif you brighten the exposurechange white balanceetc.it’s like looking at how those changes apply to your final photos. DSLRs are only like this on their rear LCD.
- No phase detection / secondary mirror alignment issues: A long-standing problem of DSLRs was focus calibration when shooting through the viewfinder. Mirrorless cameras don’t have that problembecause they read the autofocus information directly from the camera’s sensor. This means more precise autofocus through the viewfinderand fewer issues with poorly-calibrated lenses.
- Access to newer lenses: The best innovations in lens design recently have been for mirrorless lenses. Glass like Nikon’s S-line lenses or Canon’s mirrorless L lenses are some of the best we’ve ever tested. It helps that lens designers have more flexibility with mirrorless lenseswhich sit much closer to the camera sensor. (Nikon and Canon also have much larger lens mounts for mirrorless than they did for DSLRswhich gives their lens designers even more room to work with.)
- Mirrorless is where companies are innovating: Do you want the newest video specificationsfastest processing powerand any other new features that camera companies invent? Almost all of those new features are going into mirrorless camerasnot DSLRs. This isn’t due to any fault with the design of DSLRs; it’s just where camera companies are focusing their attention these days.
- Electronic viewfinder: Without a doubtan electronic viewfinder (EVF) has huge advantages over an optical viewfinder (OVF)even though some photographers love the look and feel of their OVF. Some of the key benefits are:
- Information overlay: With a DSLR’s viewfinderyou can’t overlay any information other than basic grids and focus points. (Limited camera settings are usually shown right below that.) With an EVF on a mirrorless camerayou can see all sorts of information in the viewfinderlike live exposure datahistogramswaveformszebra stripesand horizon indicators.
- Image review: Another key feature that you will never get in an OVF is image review. How cool is it to see the image that you have just captured right inside the viewfinder? On a DSLRyou need to look at the LCD screen to review an imagewhich is a big pain in bright conditions. People end up buying specialized loupes just to be able to see their LCD screen in daylight! With the EVF of a mirrorless camerayou never have to worry about thissince you can use the viewfinder for reviewing images instead.
- Focus peaking and zooming: A very useful feature that allows you to see what areas of the frame are in focus. Basicallyyou can nail focus when performing manual focus more easily on a mirrorless camera. It’s much tougher on a DSLR.
- No more viewfinder coverage issues: With an OVFyou typically get something like 95% viewfinder coverageespecially on lower-end DSLR models. This means that you’re not seeing the whole frame when you take a picture; you end up capturing a bit extra around the edges. With an EVFyou no longer have this problembecause it will always be 100% viewfinder coverage. This makes composition much easier.
- Brighter display: If there is very little lightyou cannot see much through an OVF. Focusing with OVF in low light is also difficult because you cannot easily tell if the subject is in focus until you take the picture. With an EVFbrightness levels can be boosted in low lightso that you can see everything as if it were daylight. Some image noise might be presentbut it’s still way better than trying to guess when looking through an OVF.
- Eye damage: when looking through a viewfinderyou have to be extremely careful about photographing the sunespecially with long focal length lenses. You can burn your retina in just a fraction of a second. With an EVFyou’re just looking at an LCD screenso there is no harm to your eyes; you’re not looking directly at the sunjust atessentiallya photo of it.

Mirrorless Camera Limitations
We’ve gone over the many advantages of mirrorless cameras over DSLRs. Now let’s talk about some of their current limitations.
- EVF lag: Some early or lower-end mirrorless cameras have low-quality EVFs that are not very responsive and have some lag. By comparisonan OVF on a DSLR is instantaneous. While this is certainly a nuisance if you have one of those camerasmore recent EVFs are quite goodand most people aren’t bothered by them.
- Red dot patterns: Due to the very short flange distance on a mirrorless cameramost of them suffer from a “red dot pattern” issuewhich becomes clearly visible when shot with the sun in the frame at small apertures. Basicallylight rays bounce back and forth between the sensor and the rear lens elementcreating grid patterns of red (and sometimes other colors) in images. Unfortunatelythere is no easy way around this limitation on mirrorless camerasas discussed here.
- Flash head autofocus-assist beam: The AF-assist beam on most flash heads projects infrared light onto your subjectand then uses it to focus. This works fine on DSLRs with their phase-detect focusing systemswhich are sensitive to infrared light. Unfortunatelyit doesn’t work for mirrorless cameras. In low-light situationsif you’re used to using a flashyou may find that focusing gets more difficult if you switch to mirrorless. (On most flashesmirrorless cameras refuse to even fire the AF assist light at all.)
- Price: In theoryproducing mirrorless cameras can be cheaper than producing DSLRsthanks to fewer moving parts. Occasionally this translates into less expensive mirrorless cameraslike the Nikon Z9 compared to its DSLR counterpartthe Nikon D6. Howevermost mirrorless cameras sell for a premium over their DSLR counterpartsprecisely because of all the R&D dollars that camera companies are pouring into them. Over timemirrorless camera prices will come downbut for nowDSLRs usually win in price. Used DSLRs are perhaps the best value of any segment of the camera market today.
- Battery life: Most mirrorless cameras still use more power than their DSLR counterpartslargely because of their electronic viewfinders. The result is that mirrorless cameras are rated for fewer photos per charge than most DSLRs. Although mirrorless cameras are getting better in this departmentit can still be a problem for someone who travels and has very little access to power. The good news is that today’s mirrorless cameras can usually last a full day without rechargingwhich was a major threshold. Stillyou can see the differences here:
| DSLR | CIPA Shots Per Charge | Comparable Mirrorless | CIPA Shots Per Charge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon 5D Mark IV | 900 | Canon R5 | 320 |
| Canon 7DII | 670 | Canon R7 | 660 |
| Nikon D850 | 1840 | Nikon Z7 | 420 |
| Nikon D6 | 3580 | Nikon Z9 | 740 |
When I first wrote this articlethe list of mirrorless disadvantages was longerbut with the most recent update of the articleI had to delete some of them. Mirrorless technology has already gotten much betterand I expect mirrorless cameras to continue improving within the next few years.
DSLRs no longer compete with mirrorless cameras since aside from Pentaxcamera companies have stopped designing new ones. Although many people will still use and even buy DSLRs for many years to comethe majority of new camera sales are now mirrorless.

Future Innovation for Mirrorless Cameras
In terms of innovationeverything is concentrated in the mirrorless realm. Mirrorless cameras will continue to provide many more exciting features because the possibilities are truly endless. A lot can be done with EVFs and autofocus systems alonethanks to advancements in display technologies and on-sensor data analysis.
In the realm of autofocusmirrorless cameras like the Nikon Z9 already perform very well. But with faster processors and more advanced machine-learning algorithmsautofocus and subject recognition will only improve. Imagine a system that would immediately jump to a rare bird in a flock of common ones or one that would never lose its focus lock even through the most challenging of situations.
Video is another area that is rapidly improvingbut video autofocus can still improve further. Video stabilization algorithms will also become better with faster processingperhaps one day replacing the gimbal for most videographers. Additionallywith faster sensors and processingframerates will increase. Many cameras already do 240fps videobut that is still not fast enough for some types of movementlike flying insects.
In-camera post-processing also has more potential to improve. Smartphone manufacturers have utilized such techniques to compensate for the smaller sensors in phonesbut camera manufacturers could do much more. We have a list here of some features that more cameras should have. Today’s mirrorless companies are already chipping away at that list!

What About the DSLR?
With all the advancements in the mirrorless domainit can’t be denied that DSLRs are still very capable photographic tools. The distance between the best mirrorless cameras and the best DSLRs is much less than the distance between DLSRs and film cameras.
Since so many people have switched to mirrorless nowthere are also thousands of lightly used DSLRs on the used marketincluding some amazing cameras like the D850 or Canon 5D IV. Thus a DSLR could still be the right camera for you. In factquite a few photographers still use DSLRs exclusively or in addition to their mirrorless camerasand this will probably not change for many years to come.
FinallyPentax is at least one company that still believes in the DSLR. So although mirrorless is certainly where most camera companies are focusingthe DSLR isn’t quite dead yet!

Conclusion
Although few things could be improved with mirrorless camerassuch as better battery life and lower pricesmirrorless cameras are getting pretty hard to beat. And that’s partly because camera companies want it to be that way. With the exception of Pentaxevery camera company is pouring all their new features and innovations into the mirrorless sideeven if some of those features would also have been nice on DSLRs (like the high-end video or autofocus features).
Currentlyit is still possible to get a DSLR newbut one daythe only choice for a new camera will be a mirrorless one. That doesn’t mean you need to get a mirrorless camera yetbut if you choose to buy a DSLR todayat least be aware of the pros and cons I covered in this article.
What do you think about the question of DSLR vs mirrorless cameras? Please share your thoughts below!

Are there more varieties of lens sizes available for the SLR than the mirrorless?
I am a very fit 81 year old living in Somerset UK. Unfortunately having had five hip replacements in the last 28 years I am now having difficulty lugging 2 X D5’s 1 X 400mm f2.8E1 x 300mm f2.8 and a D500 and 1 X 70-200mm f2.8 plus tripods around a football(soccer) pitch due to loss of mobility and equipment weight. I have NO intention of retiring. I would welcome sensible suggestions for (Nikon) mirrorless camera D5 replacements for both day and floodlight matches using existing lens until I can afford Z series replacements for my lens. My tripods are all CF.
I still use a Nikon D500 for my photography hobby. NasimI agree that there will be a day if I continue with Nikon that mirrorless will be in my future. For now though I still enjoy what I use and don’t feel I have outgrown it’s capabilities. There are all sorts of “DSLR is dead” articles and videos that seem to be pushing an urgency to the switch which I have never understood or agree with. Back in the early days of digital the same sort of thing was being declared of film however for some film is still the media of choice.
What I always say in my life (going on 71 years ) is that variety is a good thing and acceptance of other points of view and what others enjoy using is the spice of life. I totally agree that mirrorless is moving ahead in various areas because lots of money and effort is being put into these new cameras. I am sure DSLR technology would also be making advances but the effort isn’t there anymore. Mirrorless may be the camera of the future but in its dayvinyl records and film also was also declared obsolete but has had a resurgence recently. My point is that instead of arguing which is better and people feeling pushed to keep up by buying the latest and greatest why don’t we just enjoy the differences that each camera processes and work on improving our abilities. Some will just think that I am older and resist change however when my D500 is hampering my ability to obtain the image I want then I will buy a new tool that works for me then. That could very likely be mirrorless. Just my thoughts.
Sony recently released the A7rV. It has been compared to the D850 regarding the shooting experience. So the pressure is certainly on. An issue that seems to be getting more prevalent is the dependence on software to get the most out of a camera. I the days of filmall cameras did the same thing. Todaythere are SO many software features that cameras have become immensely complex. The DSLR or OVF camerasdue to their ageare also much simplerpartly because of the limitations imposed by the mechanics. I also wonder whether much of the modern software frenzy has more to do with marketing than field value. AF options such as birdpetanimalhumanetc. and the AI being introducedtracking optionsetc. etc. how can anyone ever figure out what settings are best? Especially in rapidly changing scenarios. I believe there will be a time when cameras become sophisticated or smart enough that you won’t need endless AF options. The biggest driver toward EVF cameras today are the improving lenses. But vintage glass has an appeal too!
I am just glad Pentax are sticking to DSLR. At least when it all finally moves over and the masses follow the marketing and latest spec sheets you will still be able to shoot with a great OVF. I never wanted a mirrorless camera; having been intrigued and tried several I still prefer the more engaging experience of a DSLR. Its the perfect balance between working for your shots and technology. I look at enough screens for work etc. Alas I am glad Pentax will still be serving this area of photography in the future with their ruggedintuitive cameras containing beautiful OVF!
I have a Nikon d780which is a bit of a hybrid. I’m attracted to the weight and size savings of a mirrorlessbut by the time I add an adapter for all my older glassthe weight difference with a Z6 II is almost gone. The software/features of mirrorless are cool. My hesitancy is on autofocus for fast action (sportsbirds in flight)where mirrorless has still not caught upand the low battery life. I just came back from a week in Franceand never changed my d780 battery. I suspect I’d be charging every dayor swapping batterieswith a mirrorless. I’ll probably sit this out until the next generation.
I read articles every day that try to convince me how much better a MILC is compared to a DLSR. When they try to convince me so much of the benefits of something that has been on the market for 5 yearsall I thinkthat the market doesn’t believe that you really need to buy a new MILC instead of the old DLSR. So you have to convince the consumers and that’s where the direct or indirect promotional articles come in. Like this one. It describes nothing new compared to what has been published for years about MILCit just repeats information that everyone already knows. Why do you try to convince those who don’t want to change? The fact that MILC sales are still only a “majority” in the market after 5 years shows that DSLRs are still being bought by photographers despite all the counter-advertising. So many people could not wrong…
The tragedy of the MILC is that DLSRs like the D850 or 5DMarkIV produce picture perfect images and have everything a photographer needs. There is simply no real reasonno real inspiration for a photographer to switch to a MILC if they are happy with their DSLR. The fancy features that are so often invoked – e.g. eye tracking – are a real advantage in very few situations. And the drawbacks – such as short battery life or EVF – are a major deterrent for many. One ophthalmologist said that EVFs can actually cause serious eye damage in the long termbecause you are pressing a screen directly on your eyes – just staring at a monitor or phone all day is tiring for the eyes soon. Going from a D70 to a D7100 was a huge leapespecially in terms of image quality and ISO noise. There is no difference in image quality between today’s pro DSLRs and MILCs.
The article is right in that the day will come when everyone will have to buy a MILC because they can’t get anything else. This is really a way to force consumers to switch. PersonallyI plan to buy another D850 when Nikon announces they are discontinuing the D850 and then I’ll have another 5-6 years with DSLR. Who knowsmaybe something will change before that time.
Planned obsolescence in a nutshell.
This really puts it all into perspective. Well done! I can only imagine what innovations there will in the next 20 years with mirrorless (compared to the previous 20 and the shift from film SLR to digital DSLR) and who knows what lies beyond. Our advancement in technology has been exponential in my lifetime and I know it will continue to be. That saiddo you think DSLR cameras will become a niche at some time in the futureas have film cameras? Will they be forgottenas were the earliest Commadore 64 and other computers?
I bought my first Nikon F2A in 1977. It is still functional. After that I have had many models including the D series Nikons. I also used Canon for a short while. But one thing is for surethere is no match for Nikon’s technology and workmanship. Now I am going to buy Nikon Z9. Nikon is like a Mercedes car‘Once you have a Mercedesyou always wanna have a Mercedes’.
I have both. Mirrorless is better in terms of easiness to usebut I find dslr is much more fun to shoot withyou rely upon your brain to get the exposure you needwhile shooting mirrorlessyou rely upon evf to do it for you.