×

注意!页面内容来自https://litfl.com/sgarbossa-criteria-ecg-library/,本站不储存任何内容,为了更好的阅读体验进行在线解析,若有广告出现,请及时反馈。若您觉得侵犯了您的利益,请通知我们进行删除,然后访问 原网页

Sgarbossa Criteria

Smith-Modified Sgarbossa Criteria
  • Concordant ST elevation ≥ 1 mm in ≥ 1 lead
  • Concordant ST depression ≥ 1 mm in ≥ 1 lead of V1-V3
  • Proportionally excessive discordant STE in ≥ 1 lead anywhere with ≥ 1 mm STEas defined by ≥ 25% of the depth of the preceding S-wave

Background
  • In patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or ventricular paced rhythminfarct diagnosis based on the ECG can be difficult
  • Abnormal depolarisation should be followed by abnormal repolarisationmanifesting as ST-segment and T-wave deviations that do not necessarily indicate acute ischaemia (“appropriate discordance”)
Sgarbossa criteria T-wave_discordance
Image: ECGMedicalTraining.com
  • Howeverserial ECGs may show dynamic ST segment changes during ischaemia
  • In 1996Elena B Sgarbossa first described criteria to assist clinicians to diagnose infarction in the setting of LBBB

Original Sgarbossa Criteria

The original three criteria used to diagnose infarction in patients with LBBB are:

  • Concordant ST elevation > 1mm in leads with a positive QRS complex (score 5)
  • Concordant ST depression > 1 mm in V1-V3 (score 3)
  • Excessively discordant ST elevation > 5 mm in leads with a -ve QRS complex (score 2)

These criteria are specificbut not sensitive (36%) for myocardial infarction. A total score of ≥ 3 is reported to have a specificity of 90% for diagnosing myocardial infarction.

Sgarbossa criteria LBBB Paced rhythm
Image: ECGMedicalTraining.com

During right ventricular pacing the ECG also shows left bundle brach block and the above rules also apply for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction during pacinghowever they are less specific.


Smith-Modified Sgarbossa Criteria

As discussed in this article by Stephen Smiththe Smith modified Sgarbossa criteria for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (OMI) in LBBB have been created to improve diagnostic accuracy. The most important change is the modification of the rule for excessive discordance.

The use of a 5 mm cutoff for excessive discordance was arbitrary and non-specific — for examplepatients with LBBB and large voltages will commonly have ST deviations > 5 mm in the absence of ischaemia. The modified rule is positive for “STEMI” if there is discordant ST elevation with amplitude > 25% of the depth of the preceding S-wave.

Smith-Modified Sgarbossa Criteria:

  • Concordant ST elevation ≥ 1 mm in ≥ 1 lead
  • Concordant ST depression ≥ 1 mm in ≥ 1 lead of V1-V3
  • Proportionally excessive discordant STE in ≥ 1 lead anywhere with ≥ 1 mm STEas defined by ≥ 25% of the depth of the preceding S-wave

See the modified Sgarbossa criteria in action in this excellent case study by Stephen Smith and references for the 1) Derivation and 2) validation of the Smith-Modified criteria

  1. Smith SW et al. Diagnosis of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block using the ST Elevation to S-Wave Ratio in a Modified Sgarbossa Rule. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2012;60:766-776
  2. Meyers HPLimkakeng AT JrJaffa EJPatel ATheiling BJRezaie SRStewart TZhuang CPera VKSmith SW. Validation of the modified Sgarbossa criteria for acute coronary occlusion in the setting of left bundle branch block: A retrospective case-control study. Am Heart J. 2015;170(6):1255-1264.

ECG Examples

Example 1
LBBB-with-Sgarbossa

Positive Sgarbossa criteria in a patient with LBBB and troponin-positive myocardial infarction:

  • This patient presented with chest pain and had elevated cardiac enzymes.
  • Previous ECG showed typical LBBB
  • There is 1mm concordant ST elevation in aVL (= 5 points)
  • Other features on this ECG that are abnormal in the context of LBBB (but not considered “positive” Sgarbossa criteria) are the pathological Q wave in lead I and the concordant ST depression in the inferior leads III and aVF.
  • This constellation of abnormalities suggests to the authors that the patient was having a high lateral infarction

Example 2
Sgarbossa criteria ventricular paced rhythm
ECG courtesy of Dr Andrew CogginsFACEM

Positive Sgarbossa criteria in a patient with a ventricular paced rhythm:

  • There is concordant ST depression in V2-5 (= Sgarbossa positive).
  • The morphology in V2-5 is reminiscent of posterior STEMIwith horizontal ST depression and prominent upright T waves.

This patient had a confirmed posterior infarctionrequiring PCI to a completely occluded posterolateral branch of the RCA.


Example 3
Sgarbossa modified Inferior STEMI CHB 2

Example 4
Paced LBBB STEMI Sgarbossa High lateral

Cases

Related Topics

References

Advanced Reading

Online

Textbooks


LITFL Further Reading

ECG LIBRARY

BA MA (Oxon) MBChB (Edin) FACEM FFSEM. Emergency physicianSir Charles Gairdner Hospital. Passion for rugby; medical history; medical education; and asynchronous learning #FOAMed evangelist. Co-founder and CTO of Life in the Fast lane | On Call: Principles and Protocol 4e| Eponyms | Books |

MBBS DDU (Emergency) CCPU. Adult/Paediatric Emergency Medicine Advanced Trainee in MelbourneAustralia. Special interests in diagnostic and procedural ultrasoundmedical educationand ECG interpretation. Co-creator of the LITFL ECG Library. Twitter: @rob_buttner

4 Comments

  1. In ECG example 1there is not only inverted P wave in lead I but also inverted P wave is present in aVL. alsopatient is having positive QRS in lead avR. Sopossibilty of RIGHT ARM – LEFT ARM Lead reversal should be considered

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.