当前位置：
X-MOL 学术
›
Communication Quarterly
›
论文详情
Our official English websitewww.x-mol.netwelcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
走向概念融合：对人际适应的考察
Communication Quarterly ( IF 1 ) Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2014.890116
Catalina L. Toma
Communication Quarterly ( IF 1 ) Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2014.890116
Catalina L. Toma
人际适应，或改变一个人的行为以适应交流伙伴，是社交互动的基础。已经提出了许多概念来解释适应，例如适应、模仿和同步。为了理解适应过程的本质和实现概念清晰度，本文回顾了交流和心理学中关于适应的重要理论。开发了一组标准并用于区分自适应过程。分析表明，传播理论倾向于将适应视为战略性的并由关系目标驱动，而心理学理论则侧重于其无意识和与目标无关的方面。传播理论强调对适应性行为的解释，而心理学理论则不强调。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Towards Conceptual Convergence: An Examination of Interpersonal Adaptation
Interpersonal adaptationor modifying one's behaviors to adjust to a communication partneris fundamental to social interaction. Numerous concepts have been advanced to explain adaptationsuch as accommodationmimicryand synchrony. This article reviews the prominent theories of adaptation in communication and psychology in view of understanding the nature of adaptive processes and of achieving conceptual clarity. A set of criteria is developed and used to distinguish between adaptive processes. The analysis shows that communication theories tend to view adaptation as strategic and driven by relational goalswhile psychological theories focus on its unconscious and goal-independent aspects. Communication theories emphasize the interpretation of adaptive behaviorswhile psychological theories do not. This review identifies theoretical gaps and suggests avenues for integration across disciplinary foci.
更新日期：2014-04-01
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Towards Conceptual Convergence: An Examination of Interpersonal Adaptation
Interpersonal adaptationor modifying one's behaviors to adjust to a communication partneris fundamental to social interaction. Numerous concepts have been advanced to explain adaptationsuch as accommodationmimicryand synchrony. This article reviews the prominent theories of adaptation in communication and psychology in view of understanding the nature of adaptive processes and of achieving conceptual clarity. A set of criteria is developed and used to distinguish between adaptive processes. The analysis shows that communication theories tend to view adaptation as strategic and driven by relational goalswhile psychological theories focus on its unconscious and goal-independent aspects. Communication theories emphasize the interpretation of adaptive behaviorswhile psychological theories do not. This review identifies theoretical gaps and suggests avenues for integration across disciplinary foci.