×

注意!页面内容来自https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00167-022-07261-3,本站不储存任何内容,为了更好的阅读体验进行在线解析,若有广告出现,请及时反馈。若您觉得侵犯了您的利益,请通知我们进行删除,然后访问 原网页

Skip to main content

The traction force of the pulled limb in hip arthroscopic surgery is determined by stiffness coefficient which is significantly related to muscle volume

  • Hip
  • Published:
Save article
View saved research
Knee SurgerySports TraumatologyArthroscopy

Abstract

Purpose

To verify the relationship between muscle volumelateral centre-edge angle (LCEA)alpha angle (AA)body mass index (BMI) and Beighton score with stiffness coefficient (SC). To analyse the difference of traction force at different physical states of hip joint capsule.

Methods

Thirty-six patients who underwent hip arthroscopy operation were included. The volumes of some related muscles were measured in MRI images by 3D Slicer. We recorded and tested differences in traction force of five joint capsule physical statesincluding before (State 1) and after joint capsule puncture (State 2)after the establishment of anterolateral and mid-anterior approaches (State 3) and after incision of the joint capsule through these two approaches (States 45). The correlation between muscle volumeBMILCEAAA and SC was verified by Spearman test. Poisson regression was used to explain confounding variables.

Results

The average force at State 1 was 531.8 N. There were significant differences in traction force between these five states (p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between muscle volumes and SC (p < 0.001). BMI had no correlation with SC (n.s.). The preoperative LCEA of the affected side was correlated with SC (p = 0.043). AA and SC were not correlated (n.s.).

Conclusion

The physical states of the hip joint capsule affected traction force. Muscle volume rather than BMI is an ideal index to estimate preoperative traction force. LCEA affected traction forcewhilst AA and Beighton score did not. Measuring the muscle volume can help estimate the most suitable traction force for the patient.

Levels of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription contentlog in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bailey TLStephens ARAdeyemi TF et al (2019) Traction timeforce and postoperative nerve block significantly influence the development and duration of neuropathy following hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 35:2825–2831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bassett AJAhlmen ARosendorf JM et al (2020) The biology of sex and sport. JBJS Rev 8:e0140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carreira DSKruchten MCEmmons BR et al (2018) A characterization of sensory and motor neural dysfunction in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery: traction- and portal placement-related nerve injuries. Orthop J Sports Med 6(9):2325967118797306. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118797306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cross GWVSobti ASKhan T (2021) Hip arthroscopy in osteoarthritis: is it an option? J Clin Orthop Trauma 30(22):101617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Curtis DMPullen WMMurray IR et al (2022) Female genderdecreased lateral center edge angle and a positive hyperextension-external rotation test are associated with ease of hip distractability at time of hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30(6):2188–2194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellenrieder MTischer TBader R et al (2017) Patient-specific factors influencing the traction forces in hip arthroscopy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(1):81–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg TDKreuzer SRandelli FMacheras GA (2021) Direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty with an orthopedic traction table. Oper Orthop Traumatol 33(4):331–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guidetti MMalloy PAlter TD et al (2022) MRI– and CT–based metrics for the quantification of arthroscopic bone resections in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Orthop Res 40(5):1174–1181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanke MSLerch TDSchmaranzer F et al (2021) Complications of hip preserving surgery. EFORT Open Rev 6(6):472–486

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jamil MDandachli WNoordin SWitt J (2018) Hip arthroscopy: indicationsoutcomes and complications. Int J Surg 54(Pt B):341–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly BTWeiland DESchenker ML et al (2005) Arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: surgical technique and review of the literature. Arthroscopy 21(12):1496–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lenze FHinterwimmer FFleckenstein L et al (2022) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of restoring hip biomechanics with and without a traction table. In Vivo 36(1):424–429

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Moo EKLeonard TRHerzog W (2020) The sarcomere force-length relationship in an intact muscle-tendon unit. J Exp Biol 223(Pt6):jeb215020. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.215020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ng KCGJeffers JRTBeaulé PE (2019) Hip joint capsular anatomymechanicsand surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101(23):2141–2151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Brien TDReeves NDBaltzopoulos V et al (2009) Strong relationships exist between muscle volumejoint power and whole-body external mechanical power in adults and children. Exp Physiol 94(6):731–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Neill DCHadley MLAdeyemi TF et al (2020) The effects of venting and capsulotomy on traction force and hip distraction in hip arthroscopy. J Hip Preserv Surg 7(3):487–495

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel NKKrumme JGolladay GJ (2021) Incidenceinjury mechanismsand recovery of iatrogenic nerve injuries during hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 29(19):e940–e949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reiman MPAgricola RKemp JL et al (2020) Consensus recommendations on the classificationdefinition and diagnostic criteria of hip-related pain in young and middle-aged active adults from the international hip-related pain research networkZurich 2018. Br J Sports Med 54(11):631–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Retchford THCrossley KMGrimaldi A et al (2013) Can local muscles augment stability in the hip? A narrative literature review. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 13(1):1–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Röling MAMathisen NMBlom I et al (2020) Traction force for peroperative hip dislocation in hip arthroscopy. Hip Int 30(3):333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schaver ALMattingly NGlass NA et al (2021) Hip arthroscopy with and without a perineal post: a comparison of early postoperative pain. Arthroscopy 37(9):2840–2845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Seijas RBarastegui DLópez-de-Celis C et al (2021) Preoperative risk factors in hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(5):1502–1509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wernly DWegrzyn JLallemand G et al (2021) Total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach with and without the use of a traction table: a matched-controlretrospectivesingle-surgeon study. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):45

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wininger AEMei-Dan OEllis TJ et al (2022) Post-related complications in hip arthroscopy are reported significantly greater in prospective versus retrospective literature: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 38(5):1658–1663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang HYou MLi Y et al (2021) Hip arthroscopy for femoracetabular impingement in China: a review and meta-analysis. Orthop Surg 13(6):1721–1729

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from Clinical Medicine Plus X—Young Scholars ProjectPeking Universitythe Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. PKU2022LCXQ005; PKU2022LCXQ015) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81902205No. 82072403).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianquan Wang or Hongjie Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Partial financial support was received from funds of the Sports Medicine Department of the Third Hospital of Peking University. There are no any relevant conflicts of interest. The authors declare they have no financial interests. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Third HospitalBeijingChina (Approval number IRB-M2019193).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

YinY.XueS.ZhangX. et al. The traction force of the pulled limb in hip arthroscopic surgery is determined by stiffness coefficient which is significantly related to muscle volume. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 312708–2715 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07261-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07261-3

Keywords